elfs: (Default)
The only book at the local library for adults with ADHD was entitled The Queen of Distraction, a book entirely for and about women with ADHD. I picked it up anyway. Good list-making tips are good no matter what your gender.

But the section on romance really (and I mean really) bugged me. Because the author wa, y'know, cool and all with the idea that hyperactives might not want to settle down, but instead spend a lifetime of moving from relationship to relationship as boredom settled in, but inattentives might well want a "real" relationship. You know, one that lasted.

She really does a fantastic job of capturing the anxiety of ADHD/I on a date. I can't stop looking at that flickering TV in the bar. He probably think I'm an idiot because I can't keep up in conversation or find the right words. Do I look okay? Am I talking enough? Too much? But the thing is, nowhere in this long (and duplicated) tale of "getting serious" is polyamory ever really discussed. I mean, seriously, if you're the sort who wants both a stable relationship and lots of lovers, have both goddamit. Just do it with everyone's consent and compassion.

There's an entire goddamn chapter on clothes and laundry. Part of it's excellent: the anxiety of buying and wearing clothes for someone with ADHD is well-written, but the whole laundry thing is so detailed it's closer to an autism spectrum disorder how-to than anything.

It's such a mix. It's like, there's ADHD, and if you want to live the most boring, middle-class, white-bread life ever, this is how you look like you're doing it while managing your spinning brain.
elfs: (Default)
It's unlikely that the gay press wants to talk about this (with one very healthy exception), but yesterday the usual suspects (all good people, really) spun anti-gay activist Mark Regnerus's speech at the Catholic University of Steubenville as "Mark Regnerus: Same-sex marriage will grant straight men 'permission to stray', anal sex," with a big focus on the sodomy part.

But that's not what Regnerus is saying at all. Here's the central paragraph of his argument:
If gay marriage is perceived as legitimate by heterosexual women, it will eventually embolden boyfriends everywhere, and not a few husbands, to press for what men have always historically wanted but were rarely allowed: sexual novelty in the form of permission to stray without jeapordizing their primary relationship. The discussion of openness in straight marriages will become more common, just as the practice of heterosexual anal sex got a big boost from the normalization of gay men's sexual behavior both in contemporary porn and the American imagination. It may be spun as empowering for women, but it sure won't, it doesn't feel that way.
Regnerus is claiming, without evidence, that anal sex would never have become a part of the modern popular imagination, even in hardcore porn, if it hadn't been for gay men. Somehow, porn actors and actresses would have completely ignored the back door if gay men hadn't forced them to look closely at it. But his claim is that this has already happened; that it's too late to turn back the clock on this issue. So what he is he really worried about?

Consensual non-monogamy. The real, last, homosexualization of the American sexual psyche. Dan Savage, in his brilliant conversation with Andrew Sullivan last year at the New York Public Library, said much the same thing: "Where straight people are now is where gay people were twenty years ago. We call them fuckbuddies; you call them friends with benefits. We call it tricking, you call it a hookup. This whole move to the big city and spend your 20s fucking a lot of people and figuring out who you are before you settle down, gay people invented that."

Gay people have spent the last ten years figuring out how to be married, how to enjoy the promise of lifetime partnership, mutual companionship, and all the support and joy that comes from having someone who is your best friend, your biggest fan, and not feel locked into the sexual straightjacket that society imposes as the price for all the rest. Polyamorous folks have adopted the language gays invented, for the most part, because it's the language that works.

This is Regnerus's greatest fear: the normalization of consensual non-monogamy. That as the twin terrors of uncontrollable reproduction and sexually transmitted infection slowly fall back with the advance of the biological sciences, that the homosexualization of our culture will proceed to the place where I, personally, have sorta expected it to go: toward a world where relationships are based not entirely on falling back into tradition and habit, but are based on the actual wants and needs of the participants, deliberately chosen and consciously enjoyed.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 06:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios