As most people know, I'm not one to get my dander up much. I know that the world is full of ridiculous people doing ridiculous things. The whole New Mexico High School censorship deal is a bit disturbing, but the ruckus and attention is healthy, the project will be a learning experience and, surprise, the idiots who tried to shut down the poetry class will learn a few things about the real value of freedom of speech-- and the kids might learn a few details about the power of the pursestring.
On the other hand, I do worry about things like this: a new bill that would empower anyone offended by material "harmful to minors" to sue in federal court and seek compensentory damages of up to $100,000. James Dobson's "Focus on the Family" says this will "turn parents into prosecuting attorneys fighting a wave of obscenity."
As some of you know, I read romance novels now and then, to see where that market is heading and how I can appeal to its readership in my SF. A lot of romance novels are signficantly sexually explicit, and those books are on the shelves at Target and K-Mart. A work is "harmful to minors" if it:
Even if the lawsuit fails, it's an expense and a waste of time for the retailer. Prosecuting obscenity is what prosecutors should be doing; empowering ordinary citizens to do what the government is supposed to be doing, and then deploying the force of the goverment behind those ordinary citizens, ought to scare the pants off anyone.
On the other hand, I do worry about things like this: a new bill that would empower anyone offended by material "harmful to minors" to sue in federal court and seek compensentory damages of up to $100,000. James Dobson's "Focus on the Family" says this will "turn parents into prosecuting attorneys fighting a wave of obscenity."
As some of you know, I read romance novels now and then, to see where that market is heading and how I can appeal to its readership in my SF. A lot of romance novels are signficantly sexually explicit, and those books are on the shelves at Target and K-Mart. A work is "harmful to minors" if it:
(A) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently offensive with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual contact, an actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition of the genitals or post-pubescent female breast; and (B) a reasonable person would find, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value for minors sufficient to overcome the pernicious effect of that material.
Even if the lawsuit fails, it's an expense and a waste of time for the retailer. Prosecuting obscenity is what prosecutors should be doing; empowering ordinary citizens to do what the government is supposed to be doing, and then deploying the force of the goverment behind those ordinary citizens, ought to scare the pants off anyone.