Military Liasons
May. 21st, 2004 12:21 pmMilitary Liason. A lot of people have been hearing this term a lot in relation to the New Mexico story and wondering what it means. It means the same thing it's meant since WW2: an officer at the local recruiting office whose job it is to go to all of the high schools and liase with the school there, looking for recruits. It's not new, you had one (or at least your school district did) when you went to school, if you were in the U.S.
Of what you should be aware is the new powers military liasons acquired in the past four years. Ever since the Vietnam war, some schools have balked at allowing recruitment and JROTC projects on their campuses, and some school districts have had policies restricting the activities of military liasons on school property.
The No Child Left Behind act changed all that. As Donald Rumsfeld himself wrote in a letter to every school administrator in the U.S., "Congress passed legislation that requires high schools to provide military recruiters access to secondary school students and directory information on those students. Military recruiters are entitled to receive the name, address, and telephone listing of juniors and seniors in high schools."
If you do not want military recruiters sniffing around your kids, there is a simple way to do it. The ACLU has some sample opt-out forms that allow you to invoke Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act and keep your kids records out of the hands of recruiters.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-21 01:03 pm (UTC)Too far
Date: 2004-05-21 01:12 pm (UTC)Re: Too far
Date: 2004-05-21 03:05 pm (UTC)Nothing new there.
Note also, if you take the PSAT & check the "give my name to schools" checkbox, West Point et al count as schools.
Re: Too far
Date: 2004-05-21 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-21 01:39 pm (UTC)IMO, if one fills out those "opt out" forms, of one supports, even tactly, the resistance to recruiting on campuses, one has zero right or standing to complain about a military that is not "representative" of the US population.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-21 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-21 04:56 pm (UTC)I don't think anybody joins the military these days who doesn't expect to be shipped out, and those who feel that it's too much of a disruption to their lives to risk serving foreign duty simply don't sign up. That's the case with me; I've been wanting to get into the Nat'l Guard since high school...but a couple of Colorado units are *always* on the front lines. I'll gladly take a pay cut to work a civilian-type job to aid the country in a time of need, even to allow foreign legion-types to mobilize. I won't get shipped out anywhere if I can possibly avoid it because I have a lot of animals in my care.
I think a taste of military service would do everyone good and our country good too. Maybe it would help reduce apathy in the citizenry to force them to get involved in a big way at least once in their lives. But just not if it entails being sent overseas into war zones by whatever idiot chickenhawk president happens to be in office.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-22 09:34 am (UTC)It's my understanding that this has been in effect for many years already. I started getting calls from military recruiters about halfway through my junior year in high school, and it didn't stop until I bitched out the twelfth Marine recruiter about the same time I would have graduated.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-22 02:30 pm (UTC)