![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Man, you have to admire this comment from Rush Limbaugh, addressing a comment by President Obama:
This is what this regime does. This regime tries to tell us how we are feeling. "This month more Americans woke up, got dressed, and headed to work in an office or factory or storefront?" "Storefront?" "Factory?" These are all Marxist and Leninist terms. So is "worker."Wow, I guess in Limbaugh's world the only real producers in our economy are "owner", "investor" and "at-will employee."
no subject
Date: 2010-04-05 04:34 pm (UTC)More bankruptcy filings this quarter iirc than any since 2005 (when a new bankruptcy law caused a peak).
Limbaugh is right about 'storefront' and 'factory'. But I think he's premature on 'regime.'
no subject
Date: 2010-04-05 04:54 pm (UTC)...just...wow...
And they're still compiling bankruptcy filings for Q1. If you meant last years, here are the numbers. (http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=60226) Not surprisingly, they tend to correlate to these numbers. (http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=usunemployment&met=unemployment_rate&tdim=true&dl=en&hl=en&q=unemployment+rate)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-06 06:46 am (UTC)Yes, non-business bankruptcy filings would be a clearer indicator of national unemployment. Filings are a definite figure that's hard to tweak; 'unemployed' gets tweaked a lot.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-05 04:35 pm (UTC)Ergo, Adam Smith and was a Communist! QED!
Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 05:01 pm (UTC)Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 05:43 pm (UTC)As for "USA reservation" - again, ...wow...
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 06:10 pm (UTC)(I couldn't find an equivalently suitable "knowledge storefront." Pity, that.)
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 06:15 pm (UTC)Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 06:11 pm (UTC)Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 06:32 pm (UTC)Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 08:26 pm (UTC)Has Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd been using the N word again? To refresh people's minds on who's party the true racist belonged to:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_org_kkk.html "Dressed in robes and sheets, intended to prevent identification by the occupying federal troops (and supposedly designed to frighten blacks), the Klan quickly became a terrorist organization in service of the Democratic Party and white supremacy. Between 1869 and 1871 its goal was to destroy Congressional Reconstruction by murdering blacks -- and some whites -- who were either active in Republican politics or educating black children."
It's more amazing when the Black Caucus waded on purpose through the Tea Party folks during their anti Obamacare rally in an attempt to cause a scene and failed. Then they couldn't get any racial slurs hurled at them (video/audio crew was with them the entire time, nothing could be heard), they simply made up the accusations not realizing the camera and mike were recording the entire event. Guess they thought since they were black, everyone would believe them and wouldn't bother checking the video/audio recording. They guess wrong.
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 08:39 pm (UTC)In short: do you have anything relevant to add to this discussion?
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-06 02:40 am (UTC)But (http://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/racist_tea_party.jpg) teabaggers (http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/images/obama-witchdoctor-muck.jpg) aren't (http://aworldofprogress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/teabagger-3.jpg) racist (http://www.newyorkslime.com/tea-party-racist-signs-04-back-to-kenya2.jpg) at (http://www.appletreeblog.com/wp-content/2009/05/teabagger-1.jpg) all.
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/30294265@N00/3447421271/)
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 08:04 pm (UTC)Bush bashing is so over used. Let's say that the previous President had a clue on how the actual, real world, economy runs and what is required when handed a recession while the money producers are over taxed to get the economy going. Unlike the now disgraced Keynesian model which has what, a $1T of borrowed money spent on a promise that the unemployment wouldn't go above 8%. Oh boy, that was an expensive failure unless your claiming the government employee unemployment remains rock solid at 4% while construction based unemployment is at 17% was a massive success in union pay back for their support, none union jobs be damned.
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 09:24 pm (UTC)Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 06:10 pm (UTC)And IMO, the snob in this particular scenario is named Limbaugh. How far will he dig to find something about which to criticize ANYone who doesn't think and opine exactly the same way he does?
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 08:35 pm (UTC)Vs having a Regime target individuals for special treatment (tax audits or specific legislation to curb that person's voice). Being on such an enemy's list when they have complete power is a truly scary thought.
Re: Factory?
Date: 2010-04-05 08:42 pm (UTC)Would that be the past Bush Regime? If not, then could you be more direct about what you're trying to say, preferably with some actual evidence to support your assertions?
Thanks...
no subject
Date: 2010-04-05 06:07 pm (UTC)Insane logic.
Date: 2010-04-05 09:04 pm (UTC)And storefronts are no longer either. We call them "malls" now. Maybe they have storefronts in China however, in which case we can also lump those in too. Not that we'll ever know, neither will 95% of the American population, so that's good enough.