I can't help but wonder if there's a factor missing from The Drake Equation, or if not a factor, at the very least a multiplier that makes the fc (fraction of civilizations that actually go on to release detectable signals) factor far smaller than anyone might anticipate.
The Drake Equation is a mathematical formula for "the number of civilizations that might arise in our galaxy with which communication might be possible." Arguments have risen over how each factor should be calculated: the rate of star formation, the average number of planets that can support life, the fraction that develop life, those that go on to be intelligent, and those that might release signals, and how long those civilizations might persist, for examples.
I've proposed in the past that the "signals/duration" part of the equation needs to be rethought: as we shift to ever more esoteric means of exploiting bandwidth, our detectable signals evolve into "noise" for anyone except ourselves, as we have the codecs necessary. It becomes even more noisy and less intelligible as coding/decoding becomes inextricably bound to cryptography and authentication.
But one other issue that's recently come to mind is this: the persistence of a civilization that can release useful signals is directly related to the availability of a local, easily exploited source of high-density energy.
For millions of years, our planet has banked somewhere between two and ten yottajoules (I enjoyed calculating that we used approximately 11.5 zettajoules of energy last year) of absorbed and produced energy in the form of oil and other natural gas sources. We have a pretty narrow window in which to bootstrap ourself into a post-petroleum civilization, and we've been very lucky to have that much easily exploitable energy at hand. We can only hope that our civilization gets its act together and achieves a post-petroluem existence without falling backward economically, with all the pain and terror that would ensue if we did.
I can't help but assume that the fc is much, much smaller than previously thought; it's not just about reaching civilization and not blowing yourselves up: it's about having resources that let you get post-agricultural at all.
The Drake Equation is a mathematical formula for "the number of civilizations that might arise in our galaxy with which communication might be possible." Arguments have risen over how each factor should be calculated: the rate of star formation, the average number of planets that can support life, the fraction that develop life, those that go on to be intelligent, and those that might release signals, and how long those civilizations might persist, for examples.
I've proposed in the past that the "signals/duration" part of the equation needs to be rethought: as we shift to ever more esoteric means of exploiting bandwidth, our detectable signals evolve into "noise" for anyone except ourselves, as we have the codecs necessary. It becomes even more noisy and less intelligible as coding/decoding becomes inextricably bound to cryptography and authentication.
But one other issue that's recently come to mind is this: the persistence of a civilization that can release useful signals is directly related to the availability of a local, easily exploited source of high-density energy.
For millions of years, our planet has banked somewhere between two and ten yottajoules (I enjoyed calculating that we used approximately 11.5 zettajoules of energy last year) of absorbed and produced energy in the form of oil and other natural gas sources. We have a pretty narrow window in which to bootstrap ourself into a post-petroleum civilization, and we've been very lucky to have that much easily exploitable energy at hand. We can only hope that our civilization gets its act together and achieves a post-petroluem existence without falling backward economically, with all the pain and terror that would ensue if we did.
I can't help but assume that the fc is much, much smaller than previously thought; it's not just about reaching civilization and not blowing yourselves up: it's about having resources that let you get post-agricultural at all.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 06:25 pm (UTC)Not a good recipe for detectability.
The size of the window during which people have access to easy sources of high-density energy, and easily accessible non-renewable resources are also going to be limited.
Another factor... how many civilizations end up going the way of, say, uploaded polities a la Greg Egan, or Matrioshka brains a la Stross.
In short, non-expansionist civilizations content to stay in one solar system, expanding neither physically nor electromagnetically.
Sadly, we don't know if FTL travel is physically possible.
Things aren't looking good for a United Federation of Planets... much as I would wish otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 09:00 pm (UTC)Anyway, my point is that even as a civilization becomes more sophisticated in their communications, it does not mean that all of the radiation from their planet would necessarily become comparably indistinguishable from noise if they deliberately continued to broadcast a signal that was designed to be detected by other civilizations and if they were able to find a way to maintain power to it.
(PS I love your A Miracle of Science icon ^_^)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:21 pm (UTC)We could pick up a deliberate broadcast... if it were being broadcast in a band we were monitoring, and was a signal we could differentiate from the background. The fact that we haven't (and haven't received any visitors) is the "Great Silence" that has us all puzzled.
Yes, my love for A Miracle of Science knows no bounds... my next desktop computer (a quad core, SLI'd, water-cooled beast) will be named "Caprice". :)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 09:20 pm (UTC)In more positive news, and more directly related to Elf's post, I'm excited about this news (http://www.physorg.com/news136738014.html). Ignoring all the hyperbole and wild speculation in the article, a way to efficiently generate hydrogen and oxygen from ordinary tap water is a huge step forward in energy storage.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:46 pm (UTC)In short, non-expansionist civilizations content to stay in one solar system, expanding neither physically nor electromagnetically.
I've never grasped why uploaded people would, by virtue of their uploading, lose all interest in interstellar expansion. I can see why they would lose some of that interest, but the other effect of being able to compress people into computer programs is that something the size of Voyager could be a vast starship with hundreds of crew onboard.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:57 pm (UTC)"A lot less," sure. But the energy, time and risk are also "a lot less" when you are a program running on a computer, can control your own perception of time by altering your clock rate, and are able to make backups and duplicates of your own personality. And you'd think that at least some of the uploaded people would recollect that their own long-term survival depends on extending their civilization's base of support out as wide as possible?