elfs: (Default)
At the risk of a Godwin, and in much the same vein as this:



I can't be the only one who sees a swastika in this: )
elfs: (Default)
Paranoid Much? by elfsternberg
Paranoid Much?
Omaha and I were at the Tukwila shopping center this morning. She went in to get something and I parked the car, and on my way to join her I passed this lovely little piece of paranoia. The claim seems to be that the Ford Foundation, the Rockerfeller Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and so forth, take their orders from the CIA and the usual subjects of paranoia, and in turn fund only those "phony left-wing" institutions that get their instructions out to the mass media. I love how the Skull & Bones shares the same responsibility as the CIA.

I'm pleased to note that the URL doesn't really go anywhere; it's now a parked URL, indicating that the owner has let it go fallow (or maybe that's what they want you to believe).

I certainly don't believe that the Trilateral Commission and the CIA control those institutions. I'm perfectly happy assuming that the Ford Foundantion, et. al., are capable of funding institutions that agree with their internal mandate sufficient not to threaten it, and I'm also happy to believe that lots of these institutions get their word out despite not being funded by the above groups. Both Kos and the Freepers seem to survive just on their own.
elfs: (Default)
Dear Barnes & Noble,

I am fully aware of the fact that each and every purchase I make with my credit card is tracked in a database somewhere. I am also fully aware that my membership in your loyalty club makes it possible for you to keep a secondary database of every purchase.

But frankly, sending me email one month after a visit to your store with the message, "By now you should have read those cookbooks, programming books, and SF novels we sold you. Here's a list of what you bought back in December, in case you forgot. We didn't. Please tell our other participants what you thought about those books," is creepy.
This may be the very moment when I decide to never pay with anything other than cash again. ATMs might be able to track my movements, but at least they won't know when I buy politically sensitive or sexually explicit books. It's one of those things I always "knew" was happening, but it's not until a big nameless, faceless conglomerate tells me right out, "We Know What You Read," that I start to wonder if trading my privacy for convenience is worth it.

Sherri at Philosecurity has a great article on how we trade our privacy for convenience and credit card companies have a vested interest in disregarding your privacy as much as possible: the more information they have about you, the earlier they are likely to discover fraud conducted by others in your name. Anne C at Existence Is Wonderful (from whom I got the Philosecurity link) likewise adds that the modern credit system is irretrievably linked to certain privileges (you cannot buy a house without a credit record, and it's even hard to find a job today without one) and not having a credit history is the equivalent today to being an "economic non-person." Like Anne, I thought I was doing well by having very little credit use history up until about 30; it wasn't until Omaha pointed out that I couldn't buy a car without a credit record that I started to use credit. Now I've become accustomed to the convenience. The cost of that convenience was made eerily apparent to me this morning.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 02:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios