elfs: (Default)
I went through an accidental upgrade Wednesday afternoon. I wasn't paying attention when I installed something, and it sucked in the latest ATI driver for my laptop along with it. Cursing, I tried to back out, only to discover that the stable driver I'd been using since February of last year was no longer supported by the Gentoo team, since too many other people had decided it wasn't stable after all.

I managed to find an old repository of that driver, but installing it didn't work; I got a big "Unsupported Hardware" watermark in the lower right-hand corner, and many of the 3D features were broken. I decided to go for the full upgrade: the latest driver with the latest X server.

It took forever, but when it was over I had it all, and to my pleasant surprise hibernate/suspend still worked as advertised, PopCap games still work wonderfully, and most 3D features are still operant. I haven't had the courage yet to try and run Quake or Prey, but playing games on my laptop is a losing proposition anyway so maybe I won't bother.
elfs: (Default)
Well, I woke up this morning to discover that my desktop rebuild had not actually finished. Almost, but not quite.

There are two primary desktops for Linux: KDE and Gnome. These are the toolkits that provide much of the functionality of the windowing environment: the toolbars, widgets, and window management. Both use a PDF management library called "poppler." Apparently, my first major build-through had build Poppler with a KDE-optimized API, but not the Gnome-optimized API, so when I tried to install Gimp, it halted the build with this message: "Please add GTK to the Poppler USE flags and try again."

I mean, crap, couldn't they just do that themselves? Anyway, I added 'app-text/poppler gtk' to the USE database and restarted.

At least 500 packages have gone in; it was only the last nine or so that had to be restarted. But those nine were all the final products, things like Inkscape (vector art program), Wine (Windows API layer), Gimp (Photoshop replacement), Scribus (Desktop publishing) and Thunderbird.

Still, this has been a hell of a lot more smooth than the 2006 install. I'm told that the 2007 was completely borked, so maybe it's good that I just skipped it and went with a fresh install anyway.
elfs: (Default)
Last night, I was working on my Django and foolishly told my system, "sure, go ahead and upgrade Python."  Big mistake.  Everything in Gentoo is python-dependent.  I'm now suffering through a long rebuild of the whole damn OS.   Everything broke: interprocess communication, bittorrent, my RSS reader, my IM system. 

Sigh.  I really ought to know better by now.
elfs: (Default)
Well, so far so good. I've enabled the CPU's auto-frequency governor, which reduces power usage quite a bit, as well as TICKLESS (turns off the kernel's internal heartbeat) and USB suspend (turns off USB connectors when not in use), and so far it still suspsends to RAM nicely. According to Intel's powertop program, I'm saving over a Watt of power, which will increase my battery life some 8% or so. Not too shabby.

I've chosen the name Chi. It's short and easy to type, and just because I wanted to. Kurumi was my second choice.

This morning, I accidentally issued the wrong command to the laptop: instead of suspend, I sent it hibernate, which does not just suspend all operations yet keeps the system "live" in memory, but actually writes out that live image to disk and shuts everything down completely and powers off. To my pleasure, the system came back to life without a hitch when I got into work: the OS booted, saw that there was a pending image, and loaded it. It worked great.

And according to Intel's powertop program, I have about 4.5 hours of battery life if all I'm doing is word processing. Now that's good news. I can take it to the cafe' with me without having to lug the cord.
elfs: (Default)
So, yesterday, I wanted to download the new Gentoo disk images for my laptop so I could upgrade it (I'm running 2004.1, and 2005.1 is out now). I tried a direct connection and it told me it would take 8 hours via HTTP for the whole 700MB file.

I usually think of bittorrent as slow. I'm used to it taking days, weeks, or even months to complete a torrent. But I decided, what the heck, I'll pull down the torrent file for Gentoo 2005.1 and see how long it would take. At least, unlike HTTP, the resume wouldn't be expensive.

It took two hours with bittorrent. Cool!

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 10:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios