A lovely new way to die!
May. 10th, 2007 11:58 amWe all know about the link between the papilloma virus and cervical cancer, right? More bad news:
People who have had more than five oral-sex partners in their lifetime are 250% more likely to have throat cancer than those who do not have oral sex, a new study suggests.
The researchers believe this is because oral sex may transmit human papillomavirus (HPV), the virus implicated in the majority of cervical cancers.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 07:09 pm (UTC)Entirely coincidentally, the makers of the new (and currently staggeringly expensive) HPV vaccines are eager for a programme to vaccinate every girl in the country.
HPV is implicated in anal cancer too, but even amongst gay and bisexual men, it only affects 35 in 100,000 men. Memory is telling me the figures are even lower for throat cancers.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 07:47 pm (UTC)Given a choice between the profit-seeking pharma companies and the eschaton-seeking fundies, I'm pretty happy casting my lot in with the former-- the patents on Gardasil will eventually expire after all.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 07:59 pm (UTC)The article states throat cancer affects 2 in 100,000 in the general adult population.
wow
Date: 2007-05-10 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 07:33 pm (UTC)oh, wait... (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-25-texas-hpv-vaccine_N.htm)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 08:12 pm (UTC)I liked the suggestion that people who engage in oral sex use condoms. This is clearly a suggestion from someone who's never tried that, as the fucking reservoir tip makes the entire experience completely unpalatable.
I've even looked for non-reservoir-tip condoms, and it seems noone makes them anymore.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 09:50 pm (UTC)Don't trust news reporting on statistics: it's math and thus hard work. Somebody's not reporting the error bars on those results. They never do.
Anyway, I think, "Virus in hole linked to cancer in hole: so what's new?"
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 08:17 am (UTC)