In a bit of news that will surprise no one, juries don't understand sadomasochism, and so courts have the right to accept retroactively withdrawn consent as assault. S&M is illegal, at least in NY.
There's a lot of messiness in the case, but the outstanding point in the article is this:
There's a lot of messiness in the case, but the outstanding point in the article is this:
Jodi testified she built up enough courage to leave Marcus in late 2001, but also conceded she continued to have contact with him, even going camping. She decided to go to the FBI when he refused to take her photos off the Internet.He may have been a cad, but if he had her consent for the photographs and their display in the first place there's not much she can do about it. It would seem that she still had voluntary contact with him and was not being held or forced against the will.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 04:10 am (UTC)As to whether she had the right to demand the pictures' removal, it's relevant whether she officially signed releases for the photos, or simply didn't object to their initial publication. I think in the latter case they remain her property.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-07 05:07 am (UTC)You are totally at the mercy of the jury. They'll understand football or even boxing and laugh out of court an attempt to charge you with assualt for those.
But let it be "kinky sex" and you are hosed.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-08 08:12 pm (UTC)http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-02-23-sm-on-trial_x.htm?csp=34