Mormon Fundamentalists vs. Connubial Queers!

[elfs]

I cannot help but wonder if it's frakking hilarious or deeply sad to read a group called "pro-polygamy.com" editorialize that "gay marriage cannot exist because marriage is defined as a union where the meeting of male and female genitalia is possible." But they do exist.

How strange!

Comments

[memegarden.livejournal.com]

Hmm...by their definition of adultery, couldn't a bonded pair of men commit adultery with women, and vice versa? And I presume that they consider any marriage that does not involve coitus to be invalid, including heterosexual couples that can't have coitus for medical reasons. I am curious about the case they describe, and expect that "adultery" was defined rather narrowly in the state law in question for such a decision to have been made. To me, this shows that the law is silly, not that there was no adultery. What a nutty lot.