Machiavellian!

[elfs]

I'm about halfway through my latest book and it's a true classic: Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince. I don't get what big deal is. On the one hand, I can understand that he seems to be particularly vicious because he talks, repeatedly, of the need of a usurper or conquerer to "exterminate" the families of opposing princes and any nobles who would challenge a prince unloved by the people, but let's face it: in the 15th century, that's what princes did.

He does lay out in more or less precise terms that it is better to be feared than loved-- but by the nobles. By the people, it is better to be loved than feared, for a prince beloved of the people can easily keep the nobles in line.

I like Machiavelli because he names names: he discusses the Borgias, the Medicis, and Savonarola, all of whom were either his contemporaries or were recent enough in memory that he could interview men who know any of the above. I think Machiavelli is known mostly because he wrote at a time that became famous in history, the Medici period, of which much else has been written, and what he said was blazing in both its truth and its necessity. The Prince is a good book for anyone interested in politics. Now that I've read it, I will say that every time a villain quotes from it, I'll just have to laugh: its use is effective only to those who've never read it.

Comments

[firewheelvortex.livejournal.com]

There's a deeper irony. Nicolla Macheovelli was a strong supporer of the overthrown republic - venice or some other such city-state, I misremember.

"The Prince" is actually the sharpest of all satires - couched in such a way that no Prince could actually stretch his neck without looking foolish, assuming they had the wit to realize they had been insulted.