(no subject)
Feb. 22nd, 2006 04:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As if life couldn't get any uglier today, James P. Hogan, the science fiction author who I enjoyed most as a teenager, announced today that he supports Holocaust Revionism. Not just David Irving's right to speak (Irving was recently sentenced to three years in prison for his Holocaust Revisionist historical writings), but support for the actual "research program" that questions whether or not the Holocaust ever happened and purports to refute the claim that the actual death toll was in "the millions."
Not even the German soldiers on trial at Nuremburg tried to claim that.
Not even the German soldiers on trial at Nuremburg tried to claim that.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 12:34 am (UTC)I personally suspect it was this royalties enabled him to quit his dayjob, but he hasn't been going out into the "real world" to refresh his well or to reorient his socialization.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 12:50 am (UTC)More data, please? I'm saddened if this is true; I liked his earlier work.
best,
Joel
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 01:22 am (UTC)He actaully believes in the Velovsky garbage...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 05:17 am (UTC)FallenPegasus mentioned that in rec.arts.sf.written he's the current canonical example of the Brain Eater. In talk.origins he's the canonical example of Salem's Hypothesis: scratch any "intelligent design" theorist or Velikofsky fanatic who claims to have an advanced degree in science, and you'll find almost inevitably that his degree is in engineering.
Hogan also does a poor job of reviewing "mainstream" sources once he's found the alternative explanation that seems to get his juices going. He's willing to read Velikovsky and Butz (and in a complete vaccuum, if you didn't know better, they actually seem to have some empirical evidence, but like Von Danken, ID, and Julian Jaynes, it's selectively chosen and deceptively presented, and knowledge of the facts usually bears this out), but is unwilling to read the reviewers who point out, with facts to back them up, that the "alternatives" are full of nonsense.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-24 11:02 pm (UTC)Too late. (http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.written/browse_frm/thread/d4087ae3a301523d/ae8a6f72d1bdc1f6?q=hogan+intelligent+design&rnum=1#ae8a6f72d1bdc1f6)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 04:26 am (UTC)Even weirder, I guess, would be someone who doesn't deny the Holocaust, but still believes that the Jews control everything.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 07:19 am (UTC)As for the Eastern front, it's hard to come up with exact numbers because the Russians did such a good job of cooking their population statistics for so long. Millions of deaths is sadly beyond question.
The deliberate extermination of the Jewish populations of Europe is fairly massively documented. Even during World War II, some US newspapers carried articles about what was happening (typically buried, as it was not really "newsworthy" or was reported through secondary sources.) Many US Army officers wrote detailed reports which are in the National Archives.
At some of the camps after the war, German officials were forced by US soldiers to tour the camps and bear witness to what had happened there. We now even have aerial photos of loaded trains coming into extermination camps and leaving empty. Over and over and over again. (Most of the imagery in question, taken by recon aircraft during the war, was not even looked at until the 1970s, and only analyzed fairly recently.)
At this point, people who deny the Holocaust (the deliberate destruction and wholesale murder of undesirable populations by the Nazi regime) have pretty much failed the laugh test with me. They are either very, very stupid or quite evil, and I have tolerance for neither.