elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
From the New York Times:
In a newly revised edition of Goodnight Moon, a book which has lulled children to sleep for nearly 60 years, the publisher, HarperCollins, has digitally altered the photograph of Clement Hurd, the illustrator, to remove a cigarette from his hand.

Well...

Date: 2005-11-17 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
at least they haven't revised Magritte's "Betrayal of Images" to be an empty picture...

Joshua Sasmor

Re: Well...

Date: 2005-11-17 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neowolf2.livejournal.com
This is not a pipe: |

Re: Well...

Date: 2005-11-17 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elfs.livejournal.com
"And indeed, this is not a pipe. This is a painting of a pipe. Right? Well, actually that's wrong. This is not a painting of a pipe, this is a drawing of a painting of a pipe. N'est-ce pas? Nope, wrong again. It's a printed copy of a drawing of a painting of a pipe. Ten copies, actually. Six, if you fold back the pages. Do you hear what I've saying? If you do, have your ears checked, because no one said a word." (Scott McCloud, Understanding Comics)

And I've just reproduced a paragraph where McCloud discussing the implications of looking at printed copies of a drawing of a painting of a pipe. Oy, vey!

Date: 2005-11-17 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pixel39.livejournal.com
Gah.

I remember back when I was a senior in high school when my English teacher brought in a newspaper article about how they were re-writing Peter Rabbit to make it "easier" for children. The rest of the class couldn't figure out why I and the teacher were so horrified.

Date: 2005-11-17 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] casualprofessor.livejournal.com
I just sent the link to my spouse - she's a senior designer in HarperCollins children's dept. She hasn't mentioned this to me...

Date: 2005-11-17 09:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] casualprofessor.livejournal.com
Apparently, the photo was passed down the chain of command at Harper with a yellow post-it note: "Delete cigarette". My spousal unit handed the photo to the retoucher, and then she placed the retouched photo in the mechanical, and passed it back up the chain of command.

Date: 2005-11-17 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elfs.livejournal.com
Bleah. That's very sad.

Date: 2005-11-17 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] casualprofessor.livejournal.com
Yup. It'll be an interesting topic after the kids are sent to bed...

Date: 2005-11-18 02:43 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
Arthur C. Clarke predicted this *years* back. It was a minor plot/background element in one of his books (Ghost from the Grand Banks?)

He had them doing it to movies too.

Date: 2005-11-18 05:40 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
And more recently, Connie Willis, Remake ....

Is that a walkie-talkie you're holding?

Date: 2005-11-19 02:40 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Is that a walkie-talkie you're holding?

Censorship in general...

Date: 2005-11-18 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
According to the Wikipedia article about Fahrenheit 451, a 1967 version of the book was released without the words "damn" or "hell" so that the books could be distributed to schools. When Bradbury objected to censoring a book about censorship, the words were restored and an afterword was added with Bradbury's comments about "well-intentioned censorship."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_451

Ironic, eh?

Joshua Sasmor

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 09:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios