Judicial Nomination Wishful Thinking
Oct. 27th, 2005 02:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
elfsAlthough I am probably not at all going to be correct, if Bush wanted someone "in the Roberts mode," he could do no better than Richard Posner or Alex Kozinski. Those two deserve that seat in a way Gonzales or Meiers never could.
If intellectual rigor is what the court needs, it couldn't do better than those two. Unfortunately, Posner's 66, but he's still an unbelievably prolific writer. Kozinski's paper trail is fascinating stuff.
Naaah. Who am I kidding? We're going to get another Souter.
If intellectual rigor is what the court needs, it couldn't do better than those two. Unfortunately, Posner's 66, but he's still an unbelievably prolific writer. Kozinski's paper trail is fascinating stuff.
Naaah. Who am I kidding? We're going to get another Souter.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-28 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-28 07:07 am (UTC)Have you actually read any of Bork's writing since he was rejected? Bork is a lunatic. His 'ideas' make the rest of the US theocrats look reasonable. Slouching Towards Gomorrah is an embaresment and shows that the Senate did precisely its job in rejecting Bork for the Supreme Court. We're all richer, safer, and, most importantly, freer because Robert Bork's dangerous ideology is nowhere near our Supreme Court. Goddess please send us more 'anti-Bork' people.