Well, this never looks good
Dec. 3rd, 2004 10:30 amEmpathy:
13.
Scoring:
0 - 32 = low (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 20)
33 - 52 = average (most women score about 47 and most men score about 42)
53 - 63 is above average
64 - 80 is very high
80 is maximum
Autism: 38
Scoring:
0 - 10 = low
11 - 22 = average (most women score about 15 and most men score about 17)
23 - 31 = above average
32 - 50 is very high (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 35)
50 is maximum
13.
Scoring:
0 - 32 = low (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 20)
33 - 52 = average (most women score about 47 and most men score about 42)
53 - 63 is above average
64 - 80 is very high
80 is maximum
Autism: 38
Scoring:
0 - 10 = low
11 - 22 = average (most women score about 15 and most men score about 17)
23 - 31 = above average
32 - 50 is very high (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 35)
50 is maximum
no subject
Date: 2004-12-03 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-03 07:58 pm (UTC)Does Not Compute
Date: 2004-12-03 07:30 pm (UTC)If this is mental illness, then I don't want to be well.
Of course, maybe this quiz has all the relevance of a Cosmo survey.
Re: Does Not Compute
Date: 2004-12-03 08:02 pm (UTC)I mean, read any book where characters are thinking "deeply" about their relationships. Do real people think like that, or do they only wish that they did?
Re: Does Not Compute
Date: 2004-12-03 09:08 pm (UTC)Re: Does Not Compute
Date: 2004-12-03 10:27 pm (UTC)That's a very helpful analysis, thank you.
(I'm INTP, occasionally INTJ)
Typo!
Date: 2004-12-03 10:33 pm (UTC)Re: Does Not Compute
Date: 2004-12-03 10:54 pm (UTC)Re: Does Not Compute
Date: 2004-12-03 11:20 pm (UTC)Because I'm a slash writer and very rarely produce original characters, as a result I very rarely have to build a character from scratch. Even so, if I place a canonically non-introspective character at the centre of one of my pieces, you can bet I'll have plenty of introspection going on.
Sometime I might raise this question in my own journal. (Not now -- bedtime UK time).
no subject
Date: 2004-12-03 08:16 pm (UTC)I got an 11 on the empathy, but 21 on the Spectrum.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-03 09:56 pm (UTC)Personally, I may just be weird.
I don't know who your anonymous friend is, but that's what I would have thought about you, too. I guess your explanation makes sense. I don't really know what normal people think like. I'd like to have a life someday where my emotions are not the huge thing I have to contend with to do what I want to do.
Tagline of the day: I don't want to BE normal. I just want to keep an eye on it in case it makes any sudden moves.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-04 09:39 pm (UTC)I like your writing, in part, because you *do* think about why people tick - I know why *I* do things, but I sometimes have to approach other's motivations from first principles.
Javahead
Another test, another diagnosis
Date: 2004-12-04 10:08 pm (UTC)With all due respect....
Date: 2004-12-06 06:46 pm (UTC)The Myers-Briggs type indicator is an exemplar of this -- an arbitrary selection of binary questions indicating qualities derived unscientifically from a mistreading of Jung that even Jung found the time to ridicule.
Also
Date: 2004-12-06 06:51 pm (UTC)If the MMPI-2 can't tell you crap about anything, what do you think 30 questions do? Especially when they transparently fail to conceal the scales they represent, asking you over and over again in different forms ("Are you a or b?") whether you meet the criterion for the scale (empathy, extroversion, whatever)
INTJ
Date: 2004-12-07 11:03 pm (UTC)