Retractions and Reactions
May. 25th, 2004 08:06 amOver at The Volokh Conspiracy, there's a "clarification" of the Rio Rancho New Mexico poetry slam story.
It didn't happen.
Both the Rio Rancho High School district and Ms. Butler, the student whose poem supposedly sparked this whole shebang, issued statements describing the Daytona Beach News-Journal's article as without substantial merit.
It's a made-up story with some vague relation to real life. Yes, there was an incident in which anti-war posters were torn down-- at a different high school. Yes, the teacher who taught poetry at Rio Rancho is on administrative leave, but the student who wrote the poem herself writes that it is not for reasons associated with her, or any students' that she knows of, writing. Yes, the principal said the phrase "shut your face," but he did so because it happens to be a line in the poem.
Whichever of these stories is true, remember: it's always a lot more complicated than the newspaper column makes it out to be.
It didn't happen.
Both the Rio Rancho High School district and Ms. Butler, the student whose poem supposedly sparked this whole shebang, issued statements describing the Daytona Beach News-Journal's article as without substantial merit.
It's a made-up story with some vague relation to real life. Yes, there was an incident in which anti-war posters were torn down-- at a different high school. Yes, the teacher who taught poetry at Rio Rancho is on administrative leave, but the student who wrote the poem herself writes that it is not for reasons associated with her, or any students' that she knows of, writing. Yes, the principal said the phrase "shut your face," but he did so because it happens to be a line in the poem.
Whichever of these stories is true, remember: it's always a lot more complicated than the newspaper column makes it out to be.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 10:11 am (UTC)There's no question that the editorial that was written Bill Hill and published by the Daytona Beach News-Journal was inaccurate...quite a bit. However, that does not mean (1) that the core incident in question (a quelling of the first amendment rights of free speech of some students and the teacher because of some poetry) didn't happen, and (2) that the school isn't lying too. Note that from what research I was able to find so far, the school's official statement is the only place I've been able to find that says that the poetry slams have *not* been canceled. No one else seems to back that up.
Couple of other interesting places to look:
http://groups.msn.com/ChironReview/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=301&LastModified=4675418155940759269
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=20030525131211.02144.00000274%40mb-m23.aol.com&rnum=1
Several things are certain. Bill Nevins was suspended, then later fired. And he was suspended shortly after this poem caused Morrell to have a hissy fit (Courtney confirmed it). And Tripp's explanation that the school fired Nevins because he didn't fill out paperwork for a field trip properly is full of shit.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 11:19 pm (UTC)It has its own tendency to political spin.
My own experience of the media is that it is pure chance whether they report a story accurately. One of our local newspapers still hasn't realised that a local cinema has been taken over by a new management company, and has a new name, in great big reassuring letters.
I can get very cynical about the press. And schools.