Setting the record straight on ejaculate
Jan. 14th, 2012 09:45 pmSo, apparently there's this meme going around that a single ejaculation containes something like 1.5 terabytes of data. However, after de-duplication and BWT-based compression, you'd only end up with something like 15KB of Shannon information.
See, this is what comes (ahem) of me encountering this meme while I'm in the midst of a crash course on bioinformatic visualization techniques.
See, this is what comes (ahem) of me encountering this meme while I'm in the midst of a crash course on bioinformatic visualization techniques.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 06:09 am (UTC)I'e never seen a man produce that length of ejaculate - it's always been quite a bit more compact than that - so I'd have to say that it's considerably more space-efficient than cassette.
But quite a bit messier, and even less durable.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 09:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 02:21 pm (UTC)I can't replicate the 15kb figure, though; even if you're compressing relative to some reference genome, the best relative compressor of genomes in wide use today gets something like 3MB (http://sun.aei.polsl.pl/gdc/).
no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-15 09:06 pm (UTC)