Well, this is not good. Looking through
miraclemax's recent post about readibility, I decided to go to The Source, the programs 'style' and 'diction', and find out about my own journal. Here's what it says for the complete record:
| readability grades: |
| | Kincaid: 6.6 |
| | ARI: 6.9 |
| | Coleman-Liau: 8.9 |
| | Flesch Index: 78.6 |
| | Fog Index: 9.6 |
| | Lix: 33.6 = below school year 5 |
| | SMOG-Grading: 8.9 |
| sentence info: |
| | 579218 characters |
| | 137877 words, average length 4.20 characters = 1.31 syllables |
| | 8057 sentences, average length 17.1 words |
| | 47% (3840) short sentences (at most 12 words) |
| | 17% (1409) long sentences (at least 27 words) |
| | 2277 paragraphs, average length 3.5 sentences |
| | 5% (409) questions |
| | 37% (3047) passive sentences |
| | longest sent 419 wds at sent 7655; shortest sent 1 wds at sent 37 |
| word usage: |
| | verb types: |
| | to be (4062) auxiliary (1232) |
| | types as % of total: |
| | conjunctions 6% (7892) pronouns 12% (16215) prepositions 12% (15942) |
| | nominalizations 1% (1294) |
| sentence beginnings: |
| | pronoun (2956) interrogative pronoun (259) article (635) |
| | subordinating conjunction (300) conjunction (457) preposition (296) |
no subject
Date: 2003-09-12 05:38 pm (UTC)It's still not nearly as popular as the sitcom meme, though. I guess computer-generated random silly mad-lib style memes are more fun than ones that attempt to give meaningful information.