Well, this is not good. Looking through
miraclemax's recent post about readibility, I decided to go to The Source, the programs 'style' and 'diction', and find out about my own journal. Here's what it says for the complete record:
readability grades: |
| Kincaid: 6.6 |
| ARI: 6.9 |
| Coleman-Liau: 8.9 |
| Flesch Index: 78.6 |
| Fog Index: 9.6 |
| Lix: 33.6 = below school year 5 |
| SMOG-Grading: 8.9 |
sentence info: |
| 579218 characters |
| 137877 words, average length 4.20 characters = 1.31 syllables |
| 8057 sentences, average length 17.1 words |
| 47% (3840) short sentences (at most 12 words) |
| 17% (1409) long sentences (at least 27 words) |
| 2277 paragraphs, average length 3.5 sentences |
| 5% (409) questions |
| 37% (3047) passive sentences |
| longest sent 419 wds at sent 7655; shortest sent 1 wds at sent 37 |
word usage: |
| verb types: |
| to be (4062) auxiliary (1232) |
| types as % of total: |
| conjunctions 6% (7892) pronouns 12% (16215) prepositions 12% (15942) |
| nominalizations 1% (1294) |
sentence beginnings: |
| pronoun (2956) interrogative pronoun (259) article (635) |
| subordinating conjunction (300) conjunction (457) preposition (296) |
no subject
Date: 2003-09-12 05:38 pm (UTC)It's still not nearly as popular as the sitcom meme, though. I guess computer-generated random silly mad-lib style memes are more fun than ones that attempt to give meaningful information.