Newsies...

Aug. 19th, 2003 10:07 am
elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
Hey, [livejournal.com profile] technoshaman, check out The Language Police, a new book about how school textbooks are authorized and written in the United States. Various textbook approval committees have banned stereotypes such as "whites living in affluent neighborhoods," or "boys expressing anger"; others have forbidden "snowman" and "forefather" on the grounds that they're sexist. One parent successfully got her daughter's grade overturned on the grounds that, since she lived in Chicago, she was unfairly disadvantaged by a writing assignment that asked her to imagine life on the ocean.


Ugh. Someone tell me that multiculturalism deserves a snowflakes's lifespan in a cyclotron after they read this.


Bwahahaha. Al Qaeda tells the boys back home, "Yeah, we caused the U.S. blackout. Don't pay attention to the news from the U.S. There was looting in the streets. New York now looks like Bagdhad."


The Baptist Press is reporting that Alan Keyes has spoken in defense of Roy Moore's Ten Commandments Monument, claiming that the First Amendment clause, as it is written, applies only to the Federal Government and not the states, and that states are free to implement whatever religious oaths and tests that they deem acceptable, to authorize state churches, and to make religious statements.

Someone remind Keyes of the following very important words:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.



A Norwegian man who discovered his friends were throwing him a surprise party decided to turn the tables and surprise them by lighting off his shotgun into the air. But he tripped and shot six of his friends instead. A likely excuse.


The Lord works in mysterious ways. At least, that's what's being said about the death of Hitoshi Nikaidoh, who was decaptitated in a freak elevator accident at St. Joseph Hospital in Texas just days before he was due to be sent to Africa as part of a Christian Mission.

Date: 2003-08-20 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendor.livejournal.com
From the AP wire today: "U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson has said he may fine the state about $5,000 a day if the monument is not removed by the end of the day Wednesday. He has said it would be permissible for the monument to be moved to a less public site, such as Moore's office."

Seems to me to be an awful weak spot in his ruling that it isn't based on "public" -vs- "private" display, but on "prominent" -vs- "less public" display.

Seems that it would either be legal to display it publicly on government property....or not legal. It's an awful grey area to get into "it's a public display....just not AS public as before"

Date: 2003-08-21 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elfs.livejournal.com
Law frequently is gray, and I think in this case Judge Thomspon is trying to make a point: the rotunda of a government building is no place for an individual, whomever he may be, to impose his religious feelings on others at taxpayer's expense. We have always recognized the power of religion in people's lives, and if we allocate "personal" space to individuals working in government service, such as offices, we should recognize that we cannot legitimately ask them to divest themselves of all personal effects, not even those that proclaim faith. We don't ask people coming to work for us to take off their yarmulkas, crosses, or sacred underwear.

On the other hand, the rotunda is not Moore's "personal" fiefdom, however he may think of it himself, and he's being checked by the forces that give him his authority in the first place.

Date: 2003-08-21 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendor.livejournal.com
And had Thompson said that moving it to a "personal" space was acceptable, then I wouldn't have issue with it.

But his statement was "a less public location".

Since both he and the Appellate Court cited that they deem it illegal for public display on government property then a less public location (but still public) on the same government property should still be illegal based on their rulings.

To me this is just further proof that Thompson is not trying to enforce the law...he is simply using his position as a cover to enforce his personal feelings on the matter.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 09:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios