Newsies...

Aug. 19th, 2003 10:07 am
elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
Hey, [livejournal.com profile] technoshaman, check out The Language Police, a new book about how school textbooks are authorized and written in the United States. Various textbook approval committees have banned stereotypes such as "whites living in affluent neighborhoods," or "boys expressing anger"; others have forbidden "snowman" and "forefather" on the grounds that they're sexist. One parent successfully got her daughter's grade overturned on the grounds that, since she lived in Chicago, she was unfairly disadvantaged by a writing assignment that asked her to imagine life on the ocean.


Ugh. Someone tell me that multiculturalism deserves a snowflakes's lifespan in a cyclotron after they read this.


Bwahahaha. Al Qaeda tells the boys back home, "Yeah, we caused the U.S. blackout. Don't pay attention to the news from the U.S. There was looting in the streets. New York now looks like Bagdhad."


The Baptist Press is reporting that Alan Keyes has spoken in defense of Roy Moore's Ten Commandments Monument, claiming that the First Amendment clause, as it is written, applies only to the Federal Government and not the states, and that states are free to implement whatever religious oaths and tests that they deem acceptable, to authorize state churches, and to make religious statements.

Someone remind Keyes of the following very important words:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.



A Norwegian man who discovered his friends were throwing him a surprise party decided to turn the tables and surprise them by lighting off his shotgun into the air. But he tripped and shot six of his friends instead. A likely excuse.


The Lord works in mysterious ways. At least, that's what's being said about the death of Hitoshi Nikaidoh, who was decaptitated in a freak elevator accident at St. Joseph Hospital in Texas just days before he was due to be sent to Africa as part of a Christian Mission.

Re: Have to agree, actually

Date: 2003-08-19 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I may be completely misremembering here, but isn't the hierarchy that any rights/responsibilities not specifically reserved for the federal government devolve to state or local governments, and anything not reserved for the state or local governments automatically devolve to the individual?


Sounds good to me.


And don't most (if not all) state constitutions include a clause specifying separation of church and state?


Yep, and I agree the monument is in violation of the Alabama constitution; that's why I think it should be removed. Or I should say, that's the legal reason it should be removed.

And, isn't Moore a federal judge anyway, and isn't the monument at the federal courthouse?


No, he's the state chief justice, and it's a state courthouse.

Jeremy

Re: Have to agree, actually

Date: 2003-08-19 10:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendor.livejournal.com
It would be a matter of debate whether or not the display is even a violation of the State Constitution in Alabama.

The clause in question would be: "SECTION 3
Religious freedom.
That no religion shall be established by law; that no preference shall be given by law to any religious sect, society, denomination, or mode of worship; that no one shall be compelled by law to attend any place of worship; nor to pay any tithes, taxes, or other rate for building or repairing any place of worship, or for maintaining any minister or ministry; that no religious test shall be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under this state; and that the civil rights, privileges, and capacities of any citizen shall not be in any manner affected by his religious principles."

The only portion that could apply in this case would be "...that no preference shall be given by law to any religious sect, society, denomination, or mode of worship..."

The question would be whether the display is preference given by law...especially since Moore has said that he is open to displays by any other religious group who asks.


Re: Have to agree, actually

Date: 2003-08-19 10:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Nah, it's also the part about taxes being used to maintain a minister or ministry. When Moore is using the resources of his office to promote the Judeo-Christian religion, that's exactly what's going on.

Jeremy

Re: Have to agree, actually

Date: 2003-08-19 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendor.livejournal.com
Ok, I'll buy that angle.

So that makes sufficient grounds to act on the matter locally in Alabama.

The Federal Courts still have no jurisdiction.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 10:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios