Dammit, now I'm spoiled...

The client I'm working for uses Subversion. I'm so used to working with DVCS's now like Git and Mercurial that I'm frustrated in my desire to "create a stab at a better experience" without conflicting with the rapidly changing needs of the product.

Derelict in my duty...

I recently re-read quite a number of Journal Entries, and the two things that I recall from that experience are these:

#1: There are a lot of typos. Some stories aren't even spell-checked adequately.

#2: There are a lot of places where I deliberately left myself openings for new stories, and then completely dropped the plot.

Worse yet, in my re-read, I forgot to either note the typos, are note the plotlines. I'm going to have to re-read them again.