elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
Does anyone see the difference I see here? In an article on how Roger Ailes is managing the blow-up of Beck, the paltryness of his hand-picked candidates for president, and greying of the Fox News audience, I saw this quote:
"For a while, if you pointed a camera at the news, Fox's ratings went up," a person close to Ailes explained. "There was the Florida recount, Bush v. Gore, 9/11, the 2004 election—until Katrina. Then the audience was kind of like, 'This is bad for the home team.'"
Note the difference there. Everything in the first list either demanded a military response or was a manufactroversy (although Bush v. Gore was a manufactroversy with debilitating consequences); Katrina is a nasty intrusion of callous reality into the daily lives of human beings. There was no one to attack. There was only humanitarian need.

This is a diamond illustration of the right-wing ideology. Humanitarian needs are irrelevant to the New American Century. Without someone to attack, the toolset of the right-wing mind is left without anything to grasp.

Notice that nobody's complained about FEMA under Obama? Apparently, it's been an effective, fast-moving, responsive agency in the hands of people who believe that government has role to play in the management of a nation.

This is unfortunate for Obama. As a friend of mine is fond of saying, "When you've done your job well, people think you've done nothing at all."
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 04:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios