PageSpeed!

Mar. 31st, 2011 07:28 pm
elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
Huh. Tried PageSpeed, a tool from Google on how to make your website more responsive. I have five websites I currently maintain. The ones I wrote myself: 90, 86, 82. The two that use off-the-shelf templates: 68, 46.

I'm not surprised. I'm fairly good at what I do. :-).

Date: 2011-04-01 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tehrasha.livejournal.com
Interesting scoring.

One of my pages scored a 70, for not optimizing the freshness lifetime of several images. In this case, the lifetime not being specified at all. It never occurred to me to set an expiration period for images that never change. (not in 5yrs anyway)

This really does not affect how fast my page loads, as much as how much faster it might -reload- at a later time...

Date: 2011-04-01 05:32 am (UTC)
solarbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] solarbird
http://crimeandtheforcesofevil.com gets an 84, with:

"High priority. These suggestions represent the largest potential performance wins for the least development effort. However, there are no high priority suggestions for this site. Good job!"

I also got the lack-of-freshness-lifetime for images.

Date: 2011-04-01 05:39 am (UTC)
solarbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] solarbird
Uplake.org also gets an 84 with no high or medium priority suggestions. You'd think that'd earn it a higher score.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910111213 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 22nd, 2026 04:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios