RED (movie, review)
Nov. 2nd, 2010 09:46 amA friend and I went to see RED, a silly little comic book movie starring Bruce Willis and Helen Mirren (as well as Morgan Freeman and John Malkovich) as retired government agents who find themselves the subject of assassination teams. Teaming back up, they fight back.
All very standard.
The battle scene at the airport is so far more over the top than other fight scenes that it stands out for inappropriate levels of silliness. It weakens the rest of the story, which is fun, the cast is obviously having a blast being kick-ass in middle-age (although Willis at 55 is playing a character who's 66, and the difference is striking). Mirren plays a weapons expert and watching the queen grab a .50cal and pound away at the president's limo, it's obvious that she's having too much fun escaping the dreary, serious roles she usually plays. Willis's opening fight scene, one old guy against six black-clad and heavily-armed soldiers, is much fun, as is the final caper. Karl Urban (who I last saw playing an awesome Bones in the JJ Abrams Star Trek reboot-- best casting decision in that entire damned film, and that includes hiring Leonard Nimoy to play Spock!) does great work as a CIA field agent and assassin. Even Ernest Borgnine looks happy to be in front of the camera once more as he explains that "RED" stands for "Retired, Extremely Dangerous."
Still, it doesn't hold together as well as it should. At times it feels like they're trying to deadpan funny an action-adventure, at others its closer to a Hellboy-like comic book. Plot holes big enough to drive a starship through come and go with regularity. The plot itself ticks along, but the feel of the film seems to have passed from editor to editor without someone to impose full coherence.
Thankfully, the film avoids many of the cinematographic trends that make movies look terrible these days. There's no ramping in this film (attention, Hollywood: Only Chris Nolan is allowed to ramp, ever again), color correction is more true than false, there's no 3D and no attempt at documentary moments. This is pure old-school action-adventure, and if you like that sort of thing, RED is the sort of thing you will like.
All very standard.
The battle scene at the airport is so far more over the top than other fight scenes that it stands out for inappropriate levels of silliness. It weakens the rest of the story, which is fun, the cast is obviously having a blast being kick-ass in middle-age (although Willis at 55 is playing a character who's 66, and the difference is striking). Mirren plays a weapons expert and watching the queen grab a .50cal and pound away at the president's limo, it's obvious that she's having too much fun escaping the dreary, serious roles she usually plays. Willis's opening fight scene, one old guy against six black-clad and heavily-armed soldiers, is much fun, as is the final caper. Karl Urban (who I last saw playing an awesome Bones in the JJ Abrams Star Trek reboot-- best casting decision in that entire damned film, and that includes hiring Leonard Nimoy to play Spock!) does great work as a CIA field agent and assassin. Even Ernest Borgnine looks happy to be in front of the camera once more as he explains that "RED" stands for "Retired, Extremely Dangerous."
Still, it doesn't hold together as well as it should. At times it feels like they're trying to deadpan funny an action-adventure, at others its closer to a Hellboy-like comic book. Plot holes big enough to drive a starship through come and go with regularity. The plot itself ticks along, but the feel of the film seems to have passed from editor to editor without someone to impose full coherence.
Thankfully, the film avoids many of the cinematographic trends that make movies look terrible these days. There's no ramping in this film (attention, Hollywood: Only Chris Nolan is allowed to ramp, ever again), color correction is more true than false, there's no 3D and no attempt at documentary moments. This is pure old-school action-adventure, and if you like that sort of thing, RED is the sort of thing you will like.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:05 pm (UTC)explosions
Karl Urban
That's three of the list of required movie-watching criteria (any movie must have at least two), so we'll be going (although renting might be safer given the experience with The Expendables).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:05 pm (UTC)I watched The Expendables with Commando (1985) in mind, as the benchmark for a "rescue the girl and blow stuff up" action movie. Despite the all-star action hero cast, the action scenes were as dry and flat as the dialogue, the fights had could have had better choreography and the plot holes are bigger than the actors' egos. There was a lack of witty banter, puns or one liners, with the exception of one scene.
It felt like they had a list of elements that exist in a classic action movie, and tried too hard to structure the movie around ticking off each item in sequence.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:29 pm (UTC)The problems we had with it were totally unrelated to anyone's acting or lack thereof, and completely because the scenery in combination with the paramilitary stuff triggered flashbacks for the person I was watching it with.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:20 pm (UTC)There was only one scene I didn't like
Date: 2010-11-03 08:02 pm (UTC)Other than that, I loved the movie.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 08:52 pm (UTC)There's no escape.