Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: All I Want Is A Democratic Leadership With A Heart, A Brain, and Courage
- 2: Surge Pricing for Grocery Stores is a Disaster Only Psychopath MBAs Could Love
- 3: Antarctica Day 7: Swimming In the Antaractic Seas
- 4: Restarted my yoga classes, and I discovered I'm a total wreck
- 5: Antarctica: Getting To the Boat and the Disaster That Awaited
- 6: The Enshittification of All That Lives
- 7: How the green energy discourse resembles queer theory
- 8: Tori's Sake & Grill (restaurant, review)
- 9: I'm Not Always Sure I Trust My ADHD Diagonosis
- 10: You can't call it "Moral Injury" when your "morals" are monstrous
Style Credit
- Base style: ColorSide by
- Theme: NNWM 2010 Fresh by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 02:54 pm (UTC)Which is to say that one statement about "watermelon tap-dancing" does not make you a racist. But spending most of your life calling black people "niggers", using ethnic slurs of other types, refusing to hire people who are black, and giving money to the KKK does say you are a racist. It is a matter of degree.
But it is also a matter of what you want to get out of the conversation as well. Will accusing them of being a racist accomplish anything? If not, focusing on what they did/said may be the better choice. But if you have the overwhelming evidence and making the accusation accomplishes the goal (hint: humiliation is not a good goal here), then that's where you need to focus.
His burglary example is a good one for both, too. Yes, you don't care whether he *is* a burglar when he steals your wallet, you just focus on what he did to get your wallet back. But, if your goal is to prove a life of burglary for punishment, or to attempt recognition of such for rehabilitation, then you have to focus on what he is.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 03:06 pm (UTC)