An amusing back-of-the-book blurb
Nov. 29th, 2009 09:35 amKarl Hansen's books War Games and Dream Games remain influential, at least to me, because they were so rich and forward-looking in terms of technology, personal ennui, and cultural malaise. The main character opens the book as a teenager subject to vicious abuse by his infinitely wealthy parents and siblings, all the while observing long orgies in which said older relatives attempt to alleviate the tedium of their long, jaded lives with ever-increasing doses of drugs, perversion, sadomasochism, and the degredation of lesser peers.
The protagonist doesn't necessarily view this lifestyle as a bad one; he just wants to be on top, a victor rather than a victim.
The book blurb on the cover of the first printing, 1981, from Playboy Paperbacks, reads:
The blurb was provided by Orson Scott Card. Yeah, the "gays are a domestic enemy destroying the fabric of our society, and Obama's giving aid and comfort to that enemy!" Orson Scott Card.
The cognitive dissonance is... dissonant.
The protagonist doesn't necessarily view this lifestyle as a bad one; he just wants to be on top, a victor rather than a victim.
The book blurb on the cover of the first printing, 1981, from Playboy Paperbacks, reads:
More real than life, more painful, and in the end, more beautiful. Hansen really goes for the jugular!Exclamation points are de rigueur for book blurbs, especially in the 1980s.
The blurb was provided by Orson Scott Card. Yeah, the "gays are a domestic enemy destroying the fabric of our society, and Obama's giving aid and comfort to that enemy!" Orson Scott Card.
The cognitive dissonance is... dissonant.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 05:41 pm (UTC)May I link to this?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 06:19 pm (UTC)Karl Hansen's War Games
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 05:47 pm (UTC)True story: OSC stopped at my friend's booth at the San Diego ComicCon to purchase her True Porn comic anthology and we chatted about video games. This was about four or five years back. He was very complimentary about my friend's art and mini-comics. This was about five minutes after Joss Whedon had dropped by and we were all suffering mental whiplash still.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 06:35 pm (UTC)http://mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/orson_scott_card/?id=3237
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 08:30 pm (UTC)I just read that whole thing, I now I need a whole bottle of brain bleach.
He says, "Wives need to have the whole society agree that when they marry, their husband is off limits to all other females. All of his protection and earning power will be devoted to her and her children, and will not be divided with other women and their children." My first thought was, "What about the woman's earning power, in relationships where it's the man who stays at home?" I know they're less common than the reverse, but they do exist. No doubt Card would find a relationship like that to be equally offensive to him.
Part of me wants to leave a comment along the lines of, "If you want to provide a good example of heterosexual marraige to your children, then do so, and more power to you. My loving relationship with my boyfriend should have no bearing on that. The only bad example they're getting is from your intolerance of people you don't even know and who wish you no personal ill will."
But if I left such a comment, no doubt I'd be inundated by hate emails - and I get enough email already. I don't need any more. Either that, or I'd just be banned from the site for being "hateful".
(I do find it interesting that the place for leaving comments is on an external site, and not the site where Card's article appears...)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-29 08:43 pm (UTC)True, but both "man stays at home" and "woman stays at home" are significantly less common than "both partners work outside the home" in opposite-gender couples, so Card's point is moot for the majority.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 09:06 am (UTC)So, in other words, "Our society is as bored and sick as it is in this book, and such perversity must be eradicated from our society. Decadence is evil, and our only salvation is hard work and sacrifice."
Except for one other commenter who pointed out that Orson Card was pedalling secular humanism in a former life, I see no dissonance at all.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-30 05:53 pm (UTC)If he blurbed it that way NOW, we'd all be blinking though.