Mütter, Mütter, Mütter
Jan. 26th, 2009 07:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I got this email today:
I'm thinking yes. We're both adults.
i am now not going to have to call you on the phone because i can drive you crazy with my emails. This will be a short one just to give you my email address. love momWell, that's interesting. Do I give her the address of this blog?
I'm thinking yes. We're both adults.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 04:04 pm (UTC)"Dear, I received this email from this poor man in Nigeria, and he was so in need and he had all this money that he couldn't get out because of these horrible people but he chose me to help him out I don't know why and I thought "why not" because I could be helpful and get some extra money at the same time so I sent him the $10,000 and now he won't talk to me..."
sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:27 pm (UTC)Heh.
They're trying to become more creative.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:34 pm (UTC)What surprises me, in a risk-analysis sort of way, is that the spammers have not yet started spoofing messages from addresses captured by traffic sniffing of one's outbound mailstream, with message subjects cobbled together by rearrangement of a list of keywords from outgoing messages. You'd think that the rate of clickthrough / positive-response on those faked messages would be higher.
a somewhat privileged position?
Date: 2009-01-30 11:49 am (UTC)On the other hand, I have read an account about a scammer using a social networking site (such as Facebook) to get some information about a target's friends, which the scammer used to try to impersonate a friend of the target when begging for emergency cash.
In this particular account, the target didn't quite fall for it.
Re: a somewhat privileged position?
Date: 2009-02-01 06:10 am (UTC)Wonder how much money they clear that way?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 05:56 pm (UTC)Anonymous Blog Reader #127
no subject
Date: 2009-01-27 06:38 pm (UTC)