"Action figures"
Nov. 24th, 2008 12:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Back in the 1960's, the GI Joe doll was introduced to the American people. In order to avoid the stigma of "boys playing with dolls," the word "doll" appears nowhere on GI Joe packaging. The masculinized term is "action figure." And yet, the men who buy love dolls seem comfortable with the idea of buying "dolls."
The "love doll" phenomenon just seems to get bigger and creepier the more I look at it. Not that it wouldn't be convenient and aerobic in some ways to own one of the stealth models (take out the "love" sleeves and put on a pillowcase and it's indistinguishable from a normal pillow), but man, the anatomically accurate disembodied torsos disturb me, as does the blatant kindergartener model and the instructions on how to shop for kid's clothes.
You can buy high quality heads, and several high-end, better than Realdoll models. And some guys have just huge collections.
There are also two forums for consumers of these products, predictably one American and one Japanese. The American one has very strict guidelines against suggesting that your doll might be underage or that you buy things for her that might make her appealing in an immature kind of way; the Japanese one has a contributor, "Kodi," who likes to brag about the frilly girly dresses he found or the black patent vinyl schoolgirl shoes he found.
One thing that intrigues me: most of the contributors to the Japanese forums can't stand the "fabric" models and are much in favor of the silicone skin, often implying that the simple love pillows aren't worth the emotional investment. Which makes me wonder just how far these guys are going with their obsession with cold, still, poseable "action" figures. There's a thick, heavy line between those seeking masturbation aids and those looking for a relationship that borders on the necrophiliac.
Of course, none of that really matters for the lonely or horny here in America. There's really no continuum. Either you get the Cadillac RealDoll or BoyToy, or you're left with an atrocious blowblow up doll.
Maybe Dekunoboo needs an American distributor.
Not me, of course. I have my reputation to consider, after all.
The "love doll" phenomenon just seems to get bigger and creepier the more I look at it. Not that it wouldn't be convenient and aerobic in some ways to own one of the stealth models (take out the "love" sleeves and put on a pillowcase and it's indistinguishable from a normal pillow), but man, the anatomically accurate disembodied torsos disturb me, as does the blatant kindergartener model and the instructions on how to shop for kid's clothes.
You can buy high quality heads, and several high-end, better than Realdoll models. And some guys have just huge collections.
There are also two forums for consumers of these products, predictably one American and one Japanese. The American one has very strict guidelines against suggesting that your doll might be underage or that you buy things for her that might make her appealing in an immature kind of way; the Japanese one has a contributor, "Kodi," who likes to brag about the frilly girly dresses he found or the black patent vinyl schoolgirl shoes he found.
One thing that intrigues me: most of the contributors to the Japanese forums can't stand the "fabric" models and are much in favor of the silicone skin, often implying that the simple love pillows aren't worth the emotional investment. Which makes me wonder just how far these guys are going with their obsession with cold, still, poseable "action" figures. There's a thick, heavy line between those seeking masturbation aids and those looking for a relationship that borders on the necrophiliac.
Of course, none of that really matters for the lonely or horny here in America. There's really no continuum. Either you get the Cadillac RealDoll or BoyToy, or you're left with an atrocious blowblow up doll.
Maybe Dekunoboo needs an American distributor.
Not me, of course. I have my reputation to consider, after all.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:14 pm (UTC)The state of some toys is indeed appalling.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:23 pm (UTC)It was such a great title, I ran with it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:51 pm (UTC)I can think of some obvious work-arounds, but the results would be a bit strange. Not outside the range of hentai manga, but strange.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:13 am (UTC)It's when the doll is reaching as a substitute for a real woman, without the relationship input, that the SF writer in me starts to wonder how far away we are from hitting the satificing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisficing) barrier for men.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:27 am (UTC)"Math is hard. Let's go drinking!"
"Math is hard. Let's go fishing!"
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:44 am (UTC)Not cold
Date: 2008-11-25 12:47 am (UTC)When not in storage, you keep them under an electric blanket. It takes a long time to gently heat up all the way through, and you don't want to apply excessive heat to the exterior to speed up the process, so it's worth the cost of electricity. Heat also speeds up offgassing, which removes the "new-car smell" that's present when you first remove the shrinkwrap.
Re: Not cold
Date: 2008-11-25 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 04:23 am (UTC)My impression of this genre of improv is that it's fun and unforgiving.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 04:34 am (UTC)It looks like fun, and is interesting to watch - so far, I've had belly laughs at every show. It does not feel like "kid theater" at all. And improv (especially in the form that they use) is quite fertile ground for philosophical meta-discussions about discussions, interactions, and life.
Shall I drop you an invite next time they perform?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 12:31 am (UTC)It occurs to me that you could fit out one of these figures with a cosume in the style of the musical Cats...
I have weird thoughts. Maybe I should just get my teddy-bear a strap-on?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 05:22 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2008-11-27 06:18 am (UTC)Unfortunately quite primitive, but clearly getting there.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 03:31 pm (UTC)I shall have to have a word with ome guys I know who were at a big Furry con, recently.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-29 07:23 pm (UTC)And they seem to be working with Angelpaws to provide Special "furry" teddy babes (http://www.teddy-babes.com/furry.html)
I'm starting to feel a little bit guilty about all this. There's a niggling little voice in the back of my head that tells me these things are wrong.
Oh, not to worry, it's just my inner bank manager, and we all know how reliable they are.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-03 12:58 am (UTC)