
- "Voters need to be reminded what McCain offers (to the extent that McCain knows what that is), and they need to be reminded that they don't know Barack Obama."
- Did Yuval Levin just admit that John McCain's understanding of what John McCain offers the American People may be limited? Is McCain "confused?"
- McCain campaign says the Keating Five scandal was "a classic smear job," and McCain's not sorry at all.
- This just blows my mind.
One of the main arguments in favor of the "Maverick" title is that John McCain acted poorly during the Keating Five scandal, was busted for it, was contrite in his censure, and has spent the rest of his career acting as a reformer seeking out the kind of corruption epitomized by the Keating scandal. His "maverick" status comes from his willingness, supposedly, to act against the wishes of his own party and pass laws that will prevent things like Keating from happening again.
Now, McCain's spokespeople are saying that the Keating scandal was "a smear job," and that the Senate was wrong to determine that McCain used "poor judgement" in his dealings with a mere "social friend."
So McCain's not a maverick. He's not repetent. His whole reputation is built on a lie. - Term of the day: Dead Cat Bounce
- A dead cat bounce is a term used by traders in the finance industry to describe a pattern wherein a spectacular decline in the price of a stock is immediately followed by a moderate and temporary rise before resuming its downward movement, with the connotation that the rise was not an indication of improving circumstances in the fundamentals of the stock. It is derived from the notion that "even a dead cat will bounce if it falls from a great height".
- Palin's staff don't want the press talking to her supporters!?
- All right, boys and girls, the McCain/Palin ticket is pulling out the feces-and-carrion encrusted knives. This is about to get ugly.
At a rally in Clearwater FL, McCain personnel prevented the press from leaving the press box to speak to rally attendees because "negative things have been written" about Palin.
Yeah. Preventing the press from speaking to private citizens will really get you positive press. - McCain becoming vile and repulsive
- This was on all the TVs in the gym this afternoon. FOX on every TV. It was Hell. And I winced as McCain said time and again that there was something wrong with Barack Obama, that all of the nasty questions about McCain's houses, his scandals, his marriage, were coming from the Obama campaign and not from lots of little individuals all reading the news, remembering different details, and ferreting out the narrative that John McCain isn't a nice or honorable man at all. He doesn't understand the Internet age at all. He doesn't get that the Invisible Hand now works just as well in politics as it does in the marketplace. (Yes, I wrote that without irony.)
And the audience was just scary. They cheered when McCain said "Who is the real Barack Obama," as if the press hadn't been doing absolutely everything it can to uncover exactly that story.
Jesus, it's gonna get bad.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-06 08:42 pm (UTC)I do wish he'd go down with a little dignity, though. Someone should tell him that a Hail Mary pass only works if you're down less than 7 points.
Anonymous Blog Reader #127
no subject
Date: 2008-10-06 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-06 09:28 pm (UTC)This is the critical period. If things stay on Obama's side for the next week or so, it will solidify into a permanent lead that McCain won't be able to break.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-06 09:37 pm (UTC)And when he gets into office, he won't have to apologize for being such a shit.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-06 10:25 pm (UTC)There *will* (I think) be blood....
I hope they'll have EMTs standing by.
PS - Elf: how's your neck/shoulder?
My Favorite Dead Cat Bounce
Date: 2008-10-06 10:51 pm (UTC)Its addictive. Enjoy.
http://www.addictinggames.com/kittencannon.html
FYI, the New Yorker's editorial...
Date: 2008-10-07 12:17 am (UTC)It's already bad.
Date: 2008-10-07 02:56 am (UTC)It's going to get worse.
But that Palin supporter in Florida didn't yell "kill him" about Obama, as you said. According to the article, he was referring to Ayers.
. png
Re: It's already bad.
Date: 2008-10-07 04:22 am (UTC)And that just makes it all better. :/
Re: It's already bad.
Date: 2008-10-07 05:28 am (UTC)I wouldn't bother with stuff like this, really, but http://factcheck.org/ isn't tracking Elf's blog.
. png
Re: It's already bad.
Date: 2008-10-07 03:12 pm (UTC)Fact: Elf never said that the supporter in Florida yelled "kill him" about Obama, as you claimed. Elf's statement was "After Palin mentioned Obama, one man allegedly shouted 'Kill him'". This is 100% true.
Fact: The article in question states that in the process of making claims regarding the relationship between Obama and Ayers, a supporter in the audience yelled out "Kill him". There is no way to determine who "him" is in this context, without talking to the supporter.
Fact: factcheck.org does not say anything about this that I could find.
Opinion: you have made an assumption regarding who that supporter was referring to by assuming that he was logically following the speech that Palin was making and would not be leaping ahead to refer to Obama in a conclusion. Without talking to the person, there is really no way to know for certain who he was referring to.
Re: It's already bad.
Date: 2008-10-07 08:08 pm (UTC)Go to the the front page of Elf's LJ. Look at that message. The relevant section reads, in its entirety:
"Palin's staff don't want the press talking to her supporters!?
( After Palin mentioned Obama, one man allegedly shouted "Kill him" )"
Ayers isn't even mentioned. There's only one "him" in that section. Without any possibility of ambiguity, Elf is creating the impression that a Palin supporter was advocating the murder of Obama.
. png