Late running brain.
Jun. 27th, 2008 04:57 pmSome of the current worship of powerful executives may come from those who admire strength and accomplishment of any sort. Others hail the display of Presidential strength ... simply because they approve of the result reached by the use of power. This is nothing less than the totalitarian philosophy that the end justifies the means. If ever there was a philosophy of government totally at war with that of the Founding Fathers, it is this one.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 12:07 am (UTC)Pat Buchanan also claims that Hitler had no interest in North America and if Hitler hadn't declared war on the US, the US should've avoided war with Nazi Germany. This ignores Hitler's second 1939 book, wherein he extensively discussed the absolute necessity of invading the United States, to reclaim the German diaspora in North America.
ETA: Oh, and, I forgot to call out separately, the Nazi plan was always to eliminate the non-"Aryans," including the Jews and the Slavs, so in case I wasn't clear, he's a lying sack of shit and a Nazi apologist (and possibly wannabe), and this isn't the first time he's spouted off with some complete bullshit like this.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell used to target women.
And has been since it was passed. In the early years, it was used regularly as a threat against women officers who resisted sexual advances from male officers - "it you won't sleep me, you must be a lesbian."
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 12:36 am (UTC)Then, after a woman has been roped into involvement in one way or the other, she has to figure out whether to ditch the investment or keep trying (maybe he's a fixer-up? maybe a new set of appealing lies about reformed ways is actually truth?)
I've seen that dynamic played over and over again (in my own life, in friends' lives) and mostly, men play the role of deceiver. NOT ALWAYS, though. I've seen (a very few) men who believed when a woman said she'd do something she wasn't even planning to do.
As to Pat Buchanan's position: as far as I can tell, one of the things the Nazi party was complaining about was the huge influx of Jews from the east (a.k.a. Russian territories) into Germany once the Pale of Settlement (Черта оседлости) after the Pale was abolished in 1917. The Oostjuden were supposedly taking all the low-paid jobs, demanding welfare support, cooked with garlic, dressed funny and didn't know how to behave in a civilized country*.
Anyhow, part of the demonization of Jews was phrased as "they should go back where they came from" - and the masses of Jews came from the East (pretty much like the demand to send undocumented workers "home", which generally means Mexico). Without the huge influx of Jews from the East, would it have been possible to demonize the local Jews, inside Germany? I'm not sure. I think it pretty much proves that politics by demonization is evil and should not be engaged in, ever, because the edge cases are more damaging than the damage to free speech in prohibiting it.
---
* Does that sound a bit like the descriptions of Mexican laborers you've head or seen lately? One lady from Texas described it as "have you any idea how much their ER visits cost us?"
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 02:26 am (UTC)When I was in the Air Force, I ran into some people that decided they didn't want to fulfill their commitment. One of the ways women would get out was to get married and get pregnant. I think you can (or could) get a medical discharge for that.
Another way to get out was to declare yourself to be gay, but this was rarely used, as it was before DADT - I think you ended up with a Bad Conduct Discharge. I don't know what you get under DADT, but I suspect it's a General Discharge.
I'm not saying there aren't women being persecuted in this, but I am saying I don't have all the facts.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 09:59 am (UTC)Pile of shit, in other words.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 12:12 pm (UTC)Plus while Germany decided against nuclear weapons research they could easily change their minds. Their reason was "if we don't win this war by the time the nukes are ready we're done for anyway", beating Russia might have given them enough of a lull to start real work... and noone would have wanted a Nazi Germany with nukes.