There are days when I just want to bind and gag my muse. But I bet she'd enjoy that. I'd promised myself that I'd go back and revise older works, but for some reason I sat down in the bus yesterday afternoon, opened up a blank file, and started writing. 1,314 words later the one-act
Androids are Like That I'd mentioned a few days ago, questions about what qualifies for legal protection under traditional Corridor law, and one of
Rache's [NSFW] little twisty stories had collided in my head.
Rache is a bit of a phenomenon: she seems to be writing a story a day, and her collection is already as big as mine. Her style is direct and her plots are crude although they're getting better and twistier. Her vocabulary is better than most and her grammar's at least as good as any magazine fiction out there. Her stories are contemporary, all over the map, often kinky and out there, and come straight from the pornoverse. Don't expect my kind of writing when you read hers.
But I thought to myself, "Oh, okay, I can just write a Rache story. Pornoverse things do happen in the Journal Entries universe from time to time, like they happen in real life."
But,
nooo, my muse has to have fun with me. The opening sentence launches with, "I'm looking for a friend I can turn off and leave off for a while without feeling guilty about it." The protagonist, a woman named Taim (a name coughed up by my random name generator and so perfect it had to be kept), ends up buying a pet. Characters need to
be something, so Taim is a coolhunter whose specialty is identifying "things to be found in coffee shops next year that people are likely to buy on impulse." Taim's major flaw is that she herself often impulse-buys without knowing why, which is how she ends up with Wolf, a big, dumb, utterly unwolflike, friendly, nonsentient(?
gryn), used robot dog whose former owner had a reputation before she sold Wolf and, as they say in the Corridor, "retired" (yeah, you can totally see where this story is going).
I've discovered one of my problems: I have to struggle to
tell (as opposed to
show) anything. I've gotten so good at creating backstories that can be revealed through dialogue and action without resorting to "As you know, Bob" moments that boiling such a backstory down to a single paragraph told by the narrator makes me uncomfortable. My voice is very much one of the narrator as limited-omnicient follower: I tell you how the character is feeling right then, but if you need to know about his history, I want to show you how he knows that history and processes it, rather than just tell you about it. I want my own fingerprints on the story to be as light as possible. I'm not so comfortable with being a revealer.
Shardik stories can get away with this and be short stories because they're in the first person: our hero can just reminisce or ruminate as required. But third-person shorts require a bit of telling. I need to figure out how that works to my satisfaction.