elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
Wait, I'm confused. In a recent case in Oregon, a man divorced his wife, converted to Judaism, and then decided that his son, who's 12, should be circumcised in accordance with his faith. The courts have sided with the father over the mother.

Even though the father made this lifestyle choice late in life, his claim is that his authority as father (and fathers have authority under Jewish law) allows him to make this life-altering choice for his son.

On the other hand, 14 year old Dennis Lindberg, who only recently converted to Jehovah's Witnessing, a religion his parents do not share, was allowed to refuse all blood tranfusions and died today due to leukemia. Lindberg made his lifestyle choice late in life at the urging of an aunt, and despite being under the authority of both parents, has died because of his refusals.

In one case, the child's wishes are irrelevant; in the other, they are tantamount. In both cases, the authority rests with the person claiming religious conviction. I don't get it. Since when does Yaweh get veto power in our secular court system?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 02:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios