![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Ten years in jail and a lifetime on the sex offender's list because one kid butt-slapped another in seventh grade. Look, why don't we just admit that we want our kids to stay in heremetically sealed boxes until they're eighteen, at which point we decant them into the system and expect them to figure out all the rules on their own?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 03:52 pm (UTC)Or perhaps on the jury, though it shouldn't be a jury-trial, since they're under aged, and not remotely close enough to be tried as adults, and thus get the 10-year sentance and be placed on the sex-offender list.
I'm curious to know if the parents were present while being questioned, since that's typically how statues work in most places. Of course the DARE officer could say he was just present while the Vice Principal questioned the boys.
Either way, if I were the judge who had this case brought before me, I'd likely dismiss it without prejudice and fine both the officer and Vice Principal for wasting the court's time. (This presumes the boys don't have a long-standing record of being troublemakers, and that this wasn't a repeat offense.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 05:59 pm (UTC)Reposted in my LJ.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:01 pm (UTC)It was still iffy, but as I recall it wasn't as totally out of line as the first reports made it seem.