Okay, I'm a camel and I've found my straw.
What are some alternatives? I hate to lose the connectivity I have here; many of the people I care about are only an flist away, and the granted access I've been able to give others is just as valuable. It's knowledge I have little idea how to make portable, and that makes moving problematic.
Our decision was based on what community we want to build and what we think is appropriate within that community and what's not. We have an awful broad range of discussions and topics and other things going on in LiveJournal, and we encourage other broad-ranging conversations on all sorts of topics. This was a specific case where we felt there was not a reason for these journals to stay online.So said Barak Berkowitz, Six Apart's chairman. Having a moral panic over some slimeball vigilante group's overeager wankfest is one thing, but refusing to admit that you've screwed up and instead saying that you're creating the kind of community you want is just sad. Don't tell me you're doing that with blind cancellations based upon a user's tagcloud; I believe that as much as I believe this bullshit will turn into gold sometime soon.
What are some alternatives? I hate to lose the connectivity I have here; many of the people I care about are only an flist away, and the granted access I've been able to give others is just as valuable. It's knowledge I have little idea how to make portable, and that makes moving problematic.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:46 am (UTC)wow.
How ... extremely unfortunate.
Where'd you see that, anyway?
I suppose there's always deadjournal.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:26 am (UTC)Live Journal was smarter than this. Six Apart? Doesn't look like it, but we'll see.
The main reason I'm on LJ is the connections with all the people I know who have Live Journals. Unless every single one of them moves elsewhere, I will always have a Live Journal, just so I can keep in the know.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:22 am (UTC)The bigger problem is convenience of access. I don't know of any way to selectively syndicate posts to people here, so they'd have to use a separate blog reader - one that can log in with OpenID and save the cookie, or something, since OpenID requires inter-site communication. That's where the real lock-in resides for LJ.
I'd wait a bit before moving. I can't deny that I, too, am curious as to alternatives.
Trust relationships outside of LJ?
Date: 2007-05-31 04:49 am (UTC)I was even considering paying LJ for the privilege until this latest kerfluffle, but this is everything I fear about letting other people have control over my content.
And I've zero development time right now, but if someone comes up with a good spec, I'll try to find time to implement it. In fact, I need to OpenID enable my blog...
Re: Trust relationships outside of LJ?
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:20 am (UTC)Oh, and if you've visited the Warriors For Innocence site, be sure to run your virus-checker. Apparently people have been picking up spyware/malware from going there.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 08:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:19 pm (UTC)The Inquirer Said It Best
Date: 2007-05-31 04:30 pm (UTC)Overall, I think The Inquirer put it best when said in response to this:
"In other words if you want a community that burns books, does not like science fiction, suppresses talk about sexuality, or anything that departs from a norm defined by a US pressure group, then Live Journal is the place for you. It is a pity you missed Germany during the 1930's you would have loved it."
Respectfully,
DB_Story