Active Entries
- 1: Surge Pricing for Grocery Stores is a Disaster Only Psychopath MBAs Could Love
- 2: Antarctica Day 7: Swimming In the Antaractic Seas
- 3: Restarted my yoga classes, and I discovered I'm a total wreck
- 4: Antarctica: Getting To the Boat and the Disaster That Awaited
- 5: The Enshittification of All That Lives
- 6: How the green energy discourse resembles queer theory
- 7: Tori's Sake & Grill (restaurant, review)
- 8: I'm Not Always Sure I Trust My ADHD Diagonosis
- 9: You can't call it "Moral Injury" when your "morals" are monstrous
- 10: Ebay vs Newmark: You're all just cogs. Accept it. There is no joy in it, but you have no choice.
Style Credit
- Base style: ColorSide by
- Theme: NNWM 2010 Fresh by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-02-23 06:59 am (UTC)Having been the treasurer for a branch of one sort, I'm *way* too familiar with the rules for some sorts and parttially familiar with thoise for the other types.
As I recall, religious and charitable organizations fall under the same category. The other two types are "educational", and "social/fraternal".
There are reasons for not taxing those sorts of groups asa well. And there really are restrictions on what can and can't be done without losing the tax-exempt status.
On the whole, I think abolishing the various sort of "non-profit" groups would probably not be a good idea. But I can see simplifying the rules a bit and enforcing them better.