elfs: (Default)
[personal profile] elfs
House Bill 4569, entered by the apalling James Sensenbrenner this season:
PROFESSIONAL DEVICE.-- (A) The term "professional device" means a device that is designed, manufactured, marketed, and intended for use by a person who regularly employs such a device for lawful business or industrial purposes, such as making, performing, displaying, distributing, or transmitting copies of audiovisual works on a commercial scale at the request of, or with the explicit permission of, the copyright owner.

(B) If a device is marketed to or is commonly purchased by persons other than those described in subparagraph (A), then such device shall not be considered to be a "professional device".
Every PC qualifies as capable of "transmitting copies of audiovisial works on a commercial scale."

Date: 2005-12-20 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
Paragraph B, if the advertising in the USA is anything like that I see here in the UK, would make a PC "marketed to". How many times does a Dell advert have to be shown on TV to count. Or IBM. Or the local computer hardware store? (In the UK we're getting a lot of PC World adverts in the run-up to Christmas.)

Settling this question has the prospect of making some lawyers rich, which I consider a primae facie indicator of a bad law.


Date: 2005-12-20 05:28 pm (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (Default)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
If only there were a way to make it a crime to commit such a bill without running into the custodes problem....

And then there's the weird-assed concept that you and I are both professionals, from a certain point of view...

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 12:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios