Date: 2005-09-14 01:19 am (UTC)
(where tremendous amounts of errors occured in tallying up who actually voted, not counting votes that had been cast, etc
Take a cue from science:

Measurement. Error.

After seeing what happened in your fair state, I'm now convinced that any election where no candidate can get more than 2-sigma over any other candidate should be thrown out as a "garbage-election" ... along with the candidates.

Measurement. Error.

In Physics, do you know what we call a system where the measurement to tell state-A from state-B falls is smaller than the measurement error? We call it a random number generator.

If votes(A) - votes(B) < VoteCountMeasurementError, you can do recounts 'til the crack-o-doom. You'll get a random result every recount.

So, do what the physicists do: declare the measurement useless, scrap the bad material (the candidates), and start over. Perhaps, with two better-quality candidates, the voters will make a clearer selection.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 07:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios