Sometimes, I wonder why I bother...

[elfs]

Psycho stalker has taken to "quoting" emails from "me" in which I claim that the Holocaust either never happened or has been over-hyped. I've complained to both Yahoo (which provides her e-mail account) and Google (which gave her posting access).

This is unquestionably libelous. It's damaging to my reputation to even have those words recorded on Google, and there can be no question of abscence of malice in this case; she is clearly out to make me seem some kind of monster.

Fortunately, nobody takes her seriously.

Comments

Ok

[flying-pegasus.livejournal.com]

I clearly don't see the whole situation. Why do you care what she is saying about you? Usually the ones with the common sense would be nose-ly enough to seek deeply in to the situation TO SEE why this person is mud-slinging your name around.

To admitted I'm on of those people, if someone tells me joe-blow is this...well I got a nose to investigate to the reason why she/he went against Socrates words of "Force of Truths"

Which basically said, if it doesn't concern you, why spread the mud as pig rolling in it for fun.

I wouldn't let it bug me....she maybe bring publicity to you in good way toward-s your creative mind in writing those stories.

Which I would like to donate to your sight to keep it running,( Pay pal thing-y ) I really don't want anyone knowing my real name....unless - well. Those that do have my real name, I have slept with or I'm planning on it... Giggle. So to get my real name, you have to sleep with me. Giggle.

Seriously - Can I donate without you finding out my real name?

[technoshaman.livejournal.com]

Who is this trollop, so I can avoid her or otherwise act accordingly if she gets too close? Offline answer is probably preferable?

[mouser.livejournal.com]

Someone needs to look up the collected quotes of Ghandi and Machiavelli (spelling on both), write an essay using ONLY direct quotations, and post it as a response to one of her rants, and attribute it to you.

Hey, if your going to be accused of saying things you didn't, you should at least "get from the best!"

[swirlgrrl.livejournal.com]

That is lame and rude of her..... lets find her and chuck pickles at her. This makes me totally grumpy.

[kightp.livejournal.com]

Beyond not taking her seriously, I'm about reading to suggest she take her vendetta elsewhere. It's not only annoying, but utterly off-topic even in a newsgroup known for tolerating a lot of topic drift.

[en-ki.livejournal.com]

People tend to respond much less to person A saying person B is an asshole than to person A pretending to quote person B saying assholic things, at least if they don't already know person B.

OK

[flying-pegasus.livejournal.com]

I'm on Hydrocodone/APAP 500mg, so for give me if this doesn't make sense.

So if person (A) is trippin on Person (B)freedom of speech and his rights to express his knowledge or creativity. All person (B) should worried about is The People of (CLTF)=( Close Loving True Friends.) opinions instead what person (A) is saying, which person A = which stand for if you look it up...
_____
\Ass\, n.
1. (Zo["o]l.) A quadruped of the genus {Equus}((E. asinus}),smaller than the horse, and having a peculiarly harsh bray and long ears. The tame or domestic ass is patient, slow,and sure-Footed, and has become the type of obstinacy and
stupidity. There are several species of wild asses which are swift-footed.

2. A dull, heavy, stupid fellow; a dolt. --Shak.

Or

As A Geek would use (My self love to use) ( A ) as example :

{Asses' Bridge}. [L. pons asinorum.] The fifth proposition of the first book of Euclid, ``The angles at the base of an isosceles triangle are equal to one another.'' [Sportive] ``A schoolboy, stammering out his Asses' Bridge.'' --F. Harrison. To bluntly put it in simple terms -
{To make an ass of one's self}, to do or say something very foolish or absurd.

So the question still stand and the answer is only on Person (B)= (in my mind) (Brilliantly Creative and gifted.)

Question : "WHY" should Person (B) cares what Person (A) is saying when The People (CLTF)+ (B) should know the truth of the answer within and Person (A) should be obsoleted from the equation. Cause ( A ) has no part in( (CLTF)+ (B) )in the first place?