May. 12th, 2016

elfs: (Default)
As an amateur futurologist (no, really!), it often falls to me to compare and contrast the news of the day in order to figure out if what's being said jibes with what I believe is coming in the next twenty years. I expect to live another twenty years, and I expect to be able to talk about whether or not my predictions will come true.

Most of the job of a futurologist isn't really to predict the future. It's to take other people's off-the-cuff comments and decide whether or not they're indicative of something more interesting. My favorite example: in 1982, Elaine Lee's Starstruck was published as a graphic novel. In one scene there's a background in which an advertisement is playing. Starstruck was absolutely prescient that video and holographic advertisements would be ubiquitous and annoying, but it was the content that got my attention.

Now, you have to understand that Starstruck was one of the seminal works of my own writing career. "Living Doll Cybernetics" and their production of non-sentient love robots, especially the way it dealt with emergent sentience and second-hand robotics, was super-significant to my own ideas about human/robot relations in a way C3PO could never be. But "Living Doll" specialized specifically in non-sentient toys because, as their slogan put it, Why fuck something with a mind of its own?

I read that and thought, "Welp, I know where the future is going."

I wasn't wrong. Here we are, 35 years after Starstruck, and Elaine Lee's prediction is spot-on. Widespread distribution of Internet pornography, in all its incarnations from the most feminist to the most abusively gonzo, has actually led to a reduction in sex assaults. The evidence is solid: pornography gives men who would commit sexual assault an alternative outlet that sometimes alleviates their criminal impulses. Violent men really would sometimes rather masturbate to images they can't even influence than go through the trouble of finding a victim.

At the same time, Men's Rights Activists predict that when apparently submissive, enthusiastic, lissome, docile and deferent sexbots appear on the market, women will be "sorry." No real men, MRAs argue, really wants to fuck a woman with a mind of her own. And they may be right.

Even more prominent: are you aware of the psychological phenomenon known as Presence?. When you read a book or watch a movie, you have to consciously be willing to suspend your disbelief. No such suspension is necessary in a sufficiently powerful virtual reality: in fact, it's hard to suspend disbelief. The Samsung Gear isn't good enough, but the Occulus Rift easily reaches this state.

Headsets will get lighter. Smaller. Not only will the sexbot you buy be physically fulfilling, but an augmented reality overlay will change her face and her body type so readily you won't need to buy more than two of them to literally have a harem of hundreds.

The fetishists of the future will be those who want to fuck their fellow flesh-and-bloods.
elfs: (Default)
Does anyone else grok that the Hyperloop is really Elon Musk's clever way of exploiting America's weird transportation politics for his own uses?

The Hyperloop is being sold to politicians and tech bros as a sweet, quick way to get from San Francisco to Los Angeles in the time it takes to get from the Financial District to Japantown by the San Francisco MTBA, when in fact it's a way to test out the viability of the Gigafactory's power supplies united with linear induction motors to power a Clarke Mass Driver.

Elon Musk never does anything without getting multiple bits of data out of it. Self driving cars are a way to test various machine learning techniques against geography until the best one presents itself. The barge landings involve a hard restart in re-entry conditions of a thin, violently fast atmosphere, the kind encountered when landing on Mars. Hyperloop is a way of testing the viability of linear induction motors for insane acceleration rates with heavy payloads.

Hyperloop is how Elon Musk has tricked investors into giving him the money to experiment with yet another way to lower the weight and cost of his first-stage rockets. They may, with some probability, get the trains their Atlas Shrugged-addled minds want. Musk will, with all probability, figure out if LIMs are a way to boost a launch vessel to a significant fraction of escape velocity without having to have the fuel on board the launch vehicle.
elfs: (Default)
The United States will never grow up.

I don't mean that in the sense that we're primed to elect Donald Trump to the presidency, or that we're still way too goddamn squeamish about sex. I mean that in the sense that we in the USA will never get our maturity fast enough to treat ourselves fairly.

In every fully mature country in the world, countries like Sweden, Japan, Norway, and South Korea, poverty is understood to be a contingency: it happened not because there was something wrong with you, or even with your parents, but is a result of a great many things, most of them historical in nature. Where you were born, the quality of schooling available there, the quality of food available there, the prevalence of clean water, the wealth, knowledge, and habits of thought your parents inherited from their parents, all of them contributed to your ability to navigate the modern world effectively and to your advantage. Yes, innate ability is a part of it, but only a tiny part, a fifth of all the influnces at best.

Ijeoma Oluo captures American attitudes toward this reality perfectly. Americans internalize early on, young in life, that innate ability is the only thing that matters: everything else can be overcome if only you're good enough, strong enough, Darwinian enough. And if you aren't, you deserve the shit life pour on you. You don't deserve a single goddamn good thing in life. (There was another beautiful story about a young boy growing up in poverty whose brother saved every penny he could to buy the kid a Nintendo handheld game, but the kid could never bring himself to play it. He felt ashamed to have something so shiny when his family was so poor. I wish I could find it again.)

Oluo says that every pleasure poor people buy is turned into a form of self-loathing. She hated her mother for buying an indulgence, and now she regrets the hatred American culture heaped upon them both for their shame.

So when Timothy B. Lee points out, we're all in that same boat, what are we gonna do?

It's popular in lefty circles to claim that capitalism requires constant growth, which is a quadratic factor on consumption: that is, if growth continutes as a static percentage, consumption must increase exponentially. The Earth is a finite resource: exponential growth will ultimately overwhelm the carrying capacity of the Earth and doom us all.

We may already be there.

If we're not doomed, let's press on. It's popular in righty circles to argue that the lefty claim is wrong: what people want changes over time, and that can be expressed as "growth" that isn't really consumption. After all, we want more and more exciting electronics, but they consume surprisingly smaller amounts of electricity as they get more and more efficient at meeting our needs. We want better and more wonderful houses, but they're also marvels of efficiency and insulation. "Growth" and "Consumption as a factor of the Earth's carrying capacity" are separate and unrelated, according to this view of economics.

I would call bullshit on this stance, but doing so may actually be completely unnecessary. Something more significant is at play nowadays: The end of significant technological improvements.

(Yes, I'm perfectly aware of then-Commissioner of Patents Charles Duell's infamous "quote" in 1899 that "Everything that can be invented has been." Duell never said it. In fact, Duell wished he would live longer to see what the 20th century would bring forth. I wish Duell were still with us; I'd love to share a drink with the man.)

As economist Timothy B. Lee (no relation to "Sir" Timothy, I believe) points out, outside of IT, medicine, transportation, we are out of room for technological improvements. The low-hanging fruits of food distribution, clothing, and housing have all been super-saturated.

I'm not sure Lee's inclusion of transportation is even vaild. Transportation of people is actually a political problem.1. Intermodal cross-ocean transportation of heavy goods has other technologies that are only now starting to come on-line as shippers look for ways to reduce costs.

Medicine and IT still have a long way to go, but I believe they're the only spaces really left. Services may have a long way to go in the US, but that linked-to article isn't really far off (I'm already ⅓ of the way there myself). Medicine and IT are also, like IT and transportation (or IT and dating!), about to become one and the same.

But if, outside of medicine, all economics becomes signalling economics ("I'm richer than you are, na-na na-na boo-boo") (Gods, I love that there's a Wikipedia entry for that!), then what for the impoverished? Especially if you're disciplined enough, or simply not interested, that you have time to spare? Some guys may be busy fucking their sexbots, and others may just be lost in virtual realities, but short of the Introdus, there's going to be an awful lot of people who haven't had the luck, circumstance, or (circumstantially-given) will to acquire the resources or (if they have the resources) the interest to play the signalling game.

What becomes of them?

Jacobin has four possbilities. I would love for "Egalitarianism and Abundance," but in a world of utter abundance, those in power would chafe having to share their world with the likes of you and me.

Which is why I say America will never grow up. America is the perfect place for "Hierarchy and Abundance" to emerge, because those who know Egalitarianism is the right outcome would never admit it, and those who chafe under Hierarchy have spent their whole lives not merely accepting it, but promulgating it not only to others, but to themselves.




1 Transportation is such a solved problem that I have had some thoughts about how to exploit it.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 12:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios