Apr. 16th, 2012

elfs: (Default)
Dr. Science over at Obsidian Wings has an article about Being That Dad, the one who brings up uncomfortable subjects and confronts the status quo at his child's schools and social events. The subject he brings up is rape culture: the expectation that "boys will be boys" and "teenage boys joke about rape as a way of figuring out sexuality," and how this topic is Not Cool.

I know how he feels. I have two teenage daughters now, and as they get older I get more and more nervous about the fact that one in eighteen college men admits to using excessive alcohol and/or the threat of violence as a way of getting sex, and are comfortable describing it as long as it's not called "rape."

The other day I was bored and hanging out on a few porn Tumblrs, and I followed a link to a guy whose taste in women got progressively, disturbingly younger the closer to the present time I went. Just as disturbing was the language he used: "I can't wait to ruin a chick like that," "I can't wait to tear some chick's shit up." It reminded me that we live in a viciously rape-accepting culture: when Slashdot runs an article about brogrammers as guys who are "cool" because their employers provide "naked chicks in the hot tub," or when Don't Ask Don't Tell advocates claim that "unit cohesion depends upon a unified mindset that sees sexually conquering women as an important aspect of the soldier's persona," you're seeing a world where men look to other men for Iron John qualities and quantities of emotional validation and source of self-esteem, and see women as good only for sexual relief irrespective of their value as human beings.

Dr. Science has a nifty definition of this kind of sexual identity: subtractive masculinity, in which being "a man" is defined by being "not a woman": if women are socially smart, men must be socially dumb; if women are beautiful, men must be either slovenly or at least purely utilitarian; if woman are moral, men must be evil. The brogrammer thing upsets me especially because it's basically creating a Last Bastion of Male Privilege: a confluence of concentrated wealth, privilege, and a century of "girls can't do math" has all added up to a hyper-insulated culture dedicated to Keeping The Subhumans Out.

If you have a subtractive view of masculinity, as long as women keep demonstrating that they can do what men do, then eventually there will no masculinity, and no men. Guys who buy into this mindset are primed to be rapists: both their frustration with a system that is failing them and their inability to see women as fully human excuses what they do.

There's a reason I wear a kilt and the Tony Stark beard. There's a reason I can talk My Little Pony and bench press 230lbs. There's a reason I have a pink cell phone cover and a working knowledge of both handguns and the Bible. I hang out with my daughters and their peers all the time, volunteering regularly for chaperone duties, and I usually take the kilt: I want to demonstrate to the young men and women in their peer group, if only for a moment, that masculinity is not predicated on avoidance but instead relies on cultivating and building on courage, industry, resolution, self-reliance, discipline, and honor. You know, the human virtues.

If you can, help Jim Hines raise money for rape and battery shelters. But more than that, don't listen to jokes about rape and be silent. One in eighteen men admits to having used force and/or deliberate excessive intoxication as a way to coerce sex from an unconsenting victim. Rapists believe that all men rape, but the ones who don't get caught are just smarter at it. In any group where someone makes a joke about rape, if you don't speak up, that one guy in eighteen thinks you're on his side.

Postscript: )
elfs: (Default)
Over at Freakonomics, Stephen Dubner writes:
During the early 1800s aluminum was considered the most valuable metal in the world. This is why the capstone to the Washington Monument is made from aluminum, and also why Napoléon III himself threw a banquet for the king of Siam where the honored guests were given aluminum utensils, while the others had to make do with gold.

Aluminium is the third most abundant element in the Earth's crust but... separating it out is a complex and difficult task. In 1886, electricity liberated aluminium from ore. Suddenly everyone on the planet had access to ridiculous amounts of cheap, light, pliable metal.

When seen through the lens of technology, few resources are truly scarce; they’re mainly inaccessible. Yet the threat of scarcity still dominates our worldview.
It's funny how Dubner makes a point about metal that slots in, at a strange angle, with what I've been saying about pornography and technological solutions to desire. Love and Sex (as opposed to masturbation) are surprisingly scarce resources; people go through their whole lives wishing they had more.

I've long said that sex technology has begun to satisfice: it suffices at satisifying desire long enough to abate the consequences of untrammeled lust. States with unhampered access to internet pornography have lower rape and sexual violence statistics than those where access is more limited. This technology for sufficing will only get better.

"Seen through the lens of technology, love and sex are not truly scarce; they're mainly inaccessible" is an interesting enough idea that maybe it deserves a few stories written about it.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 09:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios