Nov. 30th, 2009

elfs: (Default)

While visiting with friends and family this weekend, I ran into a long-missed flame who said she was frustrated because she’d gone back to school to renew her web design business, last heard from about a decade ago, but the school seemed insistent about teaching her programming instead. Her head was full of PHP and Javascript, when what she really wanted to do was “draw pretty pictures” and hand them off to the developers.

Curious, and because I’m always looking out for good designers, I asked her what her design aesthestic was.  Did she like grunge or cleanOrganic textures or vectorsDark or light?  What did she think of grids?  How about Minimalism? Typography?

I’m afraid in my high-speed way I hit her with all of those questions in one long stream and she stared back at me like a deer in the headlights.  She’d never heard of any of these terms being used in conjunction with her current studies or practices.  Now, admittedly, these were terms from poster and illustration work back in 1999 that had only just begun the leap into web design practices.  When she jumped out I was working with flat, vector advertisement people who thought the height of design sensibility was the Taco Salad typeface (Ugh, totally hate that one now, even though it’s immortalized in a design I did in 1997 that will live forever and that I can’t take back).

I’m still much more of a developer than a designer, but I keep a daily zeitgeist feed of what’s hot in the design world, and I collect and keep tickler files, so when I’m in need of a new design, I can collect a few and when I hire a designer I can say, “I want a feminine design, slightly three-d (drop shadows are adequate, some pseudo-perspective boxes would rock), with a wine-purple background to suggest sensuality and mystery.  The objective has some infographic weight, so a stable grid would be a good idea.  Let’s talk information architecture and session flow.  I want something that’s a mash-up, not a compromise, between a website that sells porn and one that sells high-end cosmetics.  The background has to be IUI compatible.” Or, “I need an info-rich magazine layout for the adult story set, something way sexier than what’s currently out there, but with enough whitespace that each article can successfully compete with its neighbors for eyeballs based on content about the length of a double-tweet. I need a bumper-sticker-sized banner, with a solid typographic cascade, for the story of the hour. And I need some Section-508 compliance in the site, so high contrast is a must.” Or, “I need a web 2.0 throwback site for a low-end web app. A simple thing. Let’s do green and white, subtle gradients and high-contrast borders, unless you’ve got something burning that I can buy into.”

Being able to talk this way with designers is a plus for me, but it also lets me experiment on my own.  I know what I want.  I know what other developers are doing with it, and I can whip out the Wacom (or, better yet, colored pencil and paper) and just let myself explore the possibilities.  I’ve been hanging out with a bunch of web “creatives” recently, and this is the language they use.  The posters of their office space run the gamut from photorealism to grunge to flat OEM (original English manga) style, with same 60’s psychedelic for a wine-and-Shakespeare festival on the far wall.

I’m sure you can run a good sized web business without this knowledge base.  But you’ll look like these guys.  I’ve sent these guys my resume’ because, you know, that’s what I’m required to do under the circumstances.   But let’s face it, these guys need help: four separate flash items on the home page, bad 2003 swirly headers, no alt tags on the title images, table based layout, and no grid sensibility at all.

This entry was automatically cross-posted from Elf's technical journal, ElfSternberg.com
elfs: (Default)

The Dunbar Number is the upper limit on the number of other people with whom one can have interpersonal relationships.  This restriction is purely cognitive, a result of evolutionary pressures, and it tops out at about 150 people.  Robin Dunbar gave a great presentation on his work, and Cracked magazine has a brilliant exposition on it, calling it The Monkeysphere.  Dunbar’s number is all about relationships: the number we can maintain in our heads.  It’s about the same size as a human tribe before the invention of civilizations with uniform laws; it’s also the maximum size of most family’s Christmas card lists.

150 people seems to be the maximum number we can treat as people rather than as abstract human beings that need categorizing and simplification in order to manage.  Laws treat human beings simply, as categories rather than as people.  So do companies bigger than 150 people. We need these abstractions to marshall large numbers of people to accomplish things that require so many, but down inside our brains we’re still dealing with the same simple small number of real people.

One the things that occurred to me this morning is that writers might have their monkeysphere slots filled with their own characters.  This might be one of the reasons we’re all so famously isolationist and loner: our slots of friendship capability are limited to those not currently occupied by the characters that haunt our stories.  And I say this because I’ve recently felt as if Ken Shardik, Aaden, and P’nyssa haven’t been as much of my monkeysphere as the rest of the world.  Part of that is because they’ve been pushed out by circumstance: they don’t have twitter feeds and Facebook accounts, they’re not part of the rest of my family’s world.  I didn’t have to keep them away from Omaha, but the kids don’t need to know about them, so dealing with them is a bit like having an affair these days.  I have to go to cafe’s and long train rides to have long conversations with them, catch up on their lives, and push the stories forward.

There are, of course, exceptions: Jay Lake seems to have pretty solid characters and yet maintains a huge monkeysphere of friends.  A skilled politician often has a prodigious memorys and can glad-hand thousands of people, making each feel as if she is a member of his tribe at least long enough to vote for him.   I seem to have a less-than-well-endowed monkeysphere, myself.  It kinda bothers me, but I’m dealing.

So, if you’re a writer: do you believe that your characters take up treasured positions in your Dunbar number of friends?

This entry was automatically cross-posted from Elf's writing journal, Pendorwright.com. Feel free to comment on either LiveJournal or Pendorwright.
elfs: (Default)
Across the street from the incubator is the Pemco insurance building, and one of the big deals is this sign on the side that proclaims in big letters, "The solar panels on the roof of this building are generating 3.3KW of power!" And I used to wonder, exactly how much power is that? What is that in meaningful terms?

Today, it's a grey day and the sign is showing a pathetic "0.11KW of power." And then it hit me: holy chao, that's 110 watts. That's two lightbulbs. The proud LED sign braying out how much energy they're generating probably takes more power to run than the solar cells generate.

Profile

elfs: (Default)
Elf Sternberg

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
151617181920 21
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 11th, 2026 03:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios