Active Entries
- 1: Surge Pricing for Grocery Stores is a Disaster Only Psychopath MBAs Could Love
- 2: Antarctica Day 7: Swimming In the Antaractic Seas
- 3: Restarted my yoga classes, and I discovered I'm a total wreck
- 4: Antarctica: Getting To the Boat and the Disaster That Awaited
- 5: The Enshittification of All That Lives
- 6: How the green energy discourse resembles queer theory
- 7: Tori's Sake & Grill (restaurant, review)
- 8: I'm Not Always Sure I Trust My ADHD Diagonosis
- 9: You can't call it "Moral Injury" when your "morals" are monstrous
- 10: Ebay vs Newmark: You're all just cogs. Accept it. There is no joy in it, but you have no choice.
Style Credit
- Base style: ColorSide by
- Theme: NNWM 2010 Fresh by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Re: Why is there such an aversion to thinking?
Date: 2010-09-29 10:48 pm (UTC)People who achieve great things will become well known. But the question is: do they become well known for those achievements? Or do they merely become famous?
I discussed this with
So, I'm saying that famous people should be famous for what they achieved, but that in the US, that's not the case. In the US, if your achievements are intellectual or artistic (instead of sports, movies, TV, or pop-music), it is extremely unlikely that you will become well-known. For the rare few that become famous for intellectual achievements, their fame will be all that's remembered, the achievements ignored and forgotten.
This makes sense. You wouldn't send your kids to a school that didn't do this. And, I have to wonder if you'd give parents who didn't value knowledge and learning any time. (Note that I say "knowledge" and "learning", not "education." Everyone thinks "education" is important. But do they encourage their kids to play chess, read, or do math puzzles? Or encourage them to take up football?) I know that I certainly wouldn't!