Active Entries
- 1: Surge Pricing for Grocery Stores is a Disaster Only Psychopath MBAs Could Love
- 2: Antarctica Day 7: Swimming In the Antaractic Seas
- 3: Restarted my yoga classes, and I discovered I'm a total wreck
- 4: Antarctica: Getting To the Boat and the Disaster That Awaited
- 5: The Enshittification of All That Lives
- 6: How the green energy discourse resembles queer theory
- 7: Tori's Sake & Grill (restaurant, review)
- 8: I'm Not Always Sure I Trust My ADHD Diagonosis
- 9: You can't call it "Moral Injury" when your "morals" are monstrous
- 10: Ebay vs Newmark: You're all just cogs. Accept it. There is no joy in it, but you have no choice.
Style Credit
- Base style: ColorSide by
- Theme: NNWM 2010 Fresh by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Re: Why is there such an aversion to thinking?
Date: 2010-09-28 04:52 pm (UTC)Einstein would be "famous because of" his intellect. Everyone knows the name Albert Einstein, and associates the name with, "Very Smart." However, the majority of people would have difficulty explaining why he's famous for being smart.
Carl Sagan is "famous because of" saying "Billions and billions," but is being slowly forgotten, as are all of the things he did, both for space exploration and science education.
Stephen Hawking is "famous because of" his intellect and, "His Achievements Despite His Handicap," but almost nobody outside of physics would be able to say what those achievements are, beyond that he overcame them even though he has ALS (if they even know that he has ALS). They may also know that he's "the Lucasian Chair at Cambridge, a position once held by Isaac Newton," but few will know why.
Anyone who majored in physics as an undergrad will know who Richard Feynman is because they admire him for his achievements, both within physics and outside of it. Few people outside of physics will even know who Richard Feynman is, let alone what his achievements were.
There are people who not only know who Hawking, Einstein, and Sagan are, but also admire them for their respective achievements. A subset of those people will even be critical of Einstein's or Hawking's work, and/or critical of Carl Sagan outside of his scientific achievements.
Sorry if I came across as preachy or harsh, there. But that's the distinction I'm making.