Active Entries
- 1: Surge Pricing for Grocery Stores is a Disaster Only Psychopath MBAs Could Love
- 2: Antarctica Day 7: Swimming In the Antaractic Seas
- 3: Restarted my yoga classes, and I discovered I'm a total wreck
- 4: Antarctica: Getting To the Boat and the Disaster That Awaited
- 5: The Enshittification of All That Lives
- 6: How the green energy discourse resembles queer theory
- 7: Tori's Sake & Grill (restaurant, review)
- 8: I'm Not Always Sure I Trust My ADHD Diagonosis
- 9: You can't call it "Moral Injury" when your "morals" are monstrous
- 10: Ebay vs Newmark: You're all just cogs. Accept it. There is no joy in it, but you have no choice.
Style Credit
- Base style: ColorSide by
- Theme: NNWM 2010 Fresh by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 07:33 pm (UTC)The real problem as I see it with the religious point of view is that it's too egocentric and myopic. Pretend for a second that God exists. Okay, great. So now God is spontaneously created out of the void and chaos instead of the universe. So either some other process created God came from somewhere else and if he came from somewhere else, then what created that elsewhere? It's a simple scoping problem. At some level, something has to have been spontaneously created from chaos and nothing.
The real question is simply: Do you believe that emergent thing was a bunch of matter and energy which had the potential to give rise to life and then thought or do you believe that emergent thing was a fully formed consciousness capable of creating something as complex as the universe.
Faced with those two choices, one is considerably more plausible than the other.