Active Entries
- 1: Surge Pricing for Grocery Stores is a Disaster Only Psychopath MBAs Could Love
- 2: Antarctica Day 7: Swimming In the Antaractic Seas
- 3: Restarted my yoga classes, and I discovered I'm a total wreck
- 4: Antarctica: Getting To the Boat and the Disaster That Awaited
- 5: The Enshittification of All That Lives
- 6: How the green energy discourse resembles queer theory
- 7: Tori's Sake & Grill (restaurant, review)
- 8: I'm Not Always Sure I Trust My ADHD Diagonosis
- 9: You can't call it "Moral Injury" when your "morals" are monstrous
- 10: Ebay vs Newmark: You're all just cogs. Accept it. There is no joy in it, but you have no choice.
Style Credit
- Base style: ColorSide by
- Theme: NNWM 2010 Fresh by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-02-06 05:51 am (UTC)No, you in fact do not know that. Yes it was a financial decision, but one thing you have to know about business, especially US business, is that financial loss is not always the reason when a "financial reason" is given.
The local blog had a quote from the former general manager which read, in part:
Over time, the changes and shifts in the market had a direct impact on the profitability of the restaurant. This, coupled with the current overall economic environment, resulted in our decision to close.
In other words, it could just as easily be that the restaurant was not making as much of a profit as the others were. Considering the downturn in the economy, doing a review of the overall financial woes of Burien (of which there are a lot) in comparison to the other store locations, and the cost of doing business in this location (a knowledge, perhaps, of the lease cost increasing severalfold, for example), they could just as easily decided that even though they were always busy, they would never actually increase revenue *enough* to override the loss that was coming, and to nip it in the bud before it became a financial loss against the other restaurants.
That's how chains think.