Not doing Nanowrimo this year...
Nov. 11th, 2008 08:50 amI'm not doing Nanowrimo this year because the first five days were eaten alive by my election volunteering and webmastering for some local races, and I'm a little burned out. For the first time in a few weeks, I did manage 2,300 words this past Friday, and another 1500 so far. I even wrote 400 last night while Kouryou-chan was getting ready for bed.
I like Nanowrimo even on the years when I don't do it. I was reading an LJ that I'll keep anonymous where the author was whining and complaining that she doesn't like Nano because, as she put it, "Creativity doesn't come on command."
I'll say this again: Yes. It. Does.
Creativity is a skill. As they're fond of reminding people over at Julliard, the deciding factor between a terrible performer and a great performer isn't innate talent, it isn't creativity, it isn't luck: it's practice. The strongest correlation between musical skill and professional success had nothing to do with innate ability and everything to do with the sheer raw number of hours one put in practicing.
Sorry, this is my biggest pet peeve with writer wannabe's and people who dis nano. You cannot be creative if you don't show up at the typewriter (even the kinds with the television on top) and start banging away at the story.
And "creativity exercises" work. Stuck? Get a big sheet of paper, write down your current stuckness, and then come up with ten ways the characters can unstick the problem. Ten short paragraphs. Pick one. Write it. You might end up throwing it away, but it's better than doing nothing.
I bet I throw away more "driving to the story" chapters (writing a bunch of stuff about the characters before the story actually begins, backstory that eventually gets chopped) in a year than most anti-nano grousers write at all in that same time. Driving to the story has to be one of my worst habits, although it does give me character grounding for later.
I like Nanowrimo even on the years when I don't do it. I was reading an LJ that I'll keep anonymous where the author was whining and complaining that she doesn't like Nano because, as she put it, "Creativity doesn't come on command."
I'll say this again: Yes. It. Does.
Creativity is a skill. As they're fond of reminding people over at Julliard, the deciding factor between a terrible performer and a great performer isn't innate talent, it isn't creativity, it isn't luck: it's practice. The strongest correlation between musical skill and professional success had nothing to do with innate ability and everything to do with the sheer raw number of hours one put in practicing.
Sorry, this is my biggest pet peeve with writer wannabe's and people who dis nano. You cannot be creative if you don't show up at the typewriter (even the kinds with the television on top) and start banging away at the story.
And "creativity exercises" work. Stuck? Get a big sheet of paper, write down your current stuckness, and then come up with ten ways the characters can unstick the problem. Ten short paragraphs. Pick one. Write it. You might end up throwing it away, but it's better than doing nothing.
I bet I throw away more "driving to the story" chapters (writing a bunch of stuff about the characters before the story actually begins, backstory that eventually gets chopped) in a year than most anti-nano grousers write at all in that same time. Driving to the story has to be one of my worst habits, although it does give me character grounding for later.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 07:07 pm (UTC)I even dared delete a couple of thousand word which threatened to cut the story short.
But the two biggest things that made it seem I could pull it off?
First, my brother's explanation of just why our schoolteachers were so incompetent: he's an educational statistician. I got my English Language and English Literature O-levels, and I got one of them a year early, but there's so much they never seemed to bother with.
Second, and bunch of people saying good things about the shorter fiction I wrote, earlier this year.
So here I am, with 27,000 words on the clock, and planning to chop out a bit again, but I know what's coming. I know what the story needs.
Half a world away, there's another man in love, and he's going to do something really stupid.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 07:20 pm (UTC)And nanowrimo provides a structure for not stopping for at least a month, and gives you a pair of marker posts to reach that you can uses as incentives to keep going when you really, really feel like stopping.
I'm not doing my parallel world nanowrimo (NaNoteWriMo) this year because I don't really need that anymore, and because I have other music skills that require significant honing. But I have written one song this month, and fixed another, and I might well try it next year, because last year I think it did me some good.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 10:47 pm (UTC)It can be a challenging skill to master, but entire corporations base their growth strategies completely around it (and yes, it is absolutely the same kind of creativity, even if the delivery mechanism is different).
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 12:21 am (UTC)If you force yourself to do a whole novel in only one month, and nothing for the other 11 months, how can you expect to really do insanely well? You won't have the discipline, the mental flexibility, or the tools to write to the best of your ability. You should do NaNoWriMo, NaDeWriMo, NaJaWriMo, and the rest of the year too.
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 02:29 am (UTC)I'm already interested in reading it.